Posted 2018-July-13, 14:48
He meant 3♠. This actually showed 16 or *less* total points, not exactly 16. But the entire response structure is messed up - every single possible response to 2NT makes no sense:
3♣ - 3+ ♣, 3- total points?!?
3♦ - 3+ ♦, 3+ HCP, 3- total points?!?
3♥ - 3+ ♦, 10-16 total points, forcing to 4♦
3♠ - 16- total points
3NT - 5- ♥, 5- ♠, 12+ HCP, 16- total points, likely stop in ♥ and ♠
4♣ - 5+ ♣, 16- total points
4♦ - 5+ ♦, 16- total points
4♥ - 3+ ♦, 14-16 total points, forcing to 5♦
4♠ - biddable ♠, 16- total points
4NT - quantitative invite to 6NT, 16+ HCP, 16- total points
5♣ - biddable ♣, 16- total points
5♦ - biddable ♦, 16- total points
And to add to the fun:
Pass - no suitable call, 16- total points, forcing
Oh dear oh dear.