cia vs. pelosi
#1
Posted 2009-May-22, 10:23
btw, the bill was defeated
#3
Posted 2009-May-22, 10:41
With this said and done, I would welcome a thorough examination designed to ferret out who knew what (and when). As I have mentioned in the past, I think that officials in the previous administration should be tried for war crimes. I most certainly don't think that the Pelosi and co warrant special treatment because of their political party.
#4
Posted 2009-May-22, 10:43
#5
Posted 2009-May-22, 10:50
jdonn, on May 22 2009, 07:43 PM, said:
I assume that you are all familiar with the following
http://www.metacafe....wbacca_defense/
#6
Posted 2009-May-22, 11:15
#7
Posted 2009-May-22, 11:47
It is not just Pelosi who says the CIA was less than truthful. The gist of that article (many others on internet) is:
Quote
"We cannot have a community that operates outside the law and covers up what it does and lies to Congress."
Hoekstra was reacting to the 2001 downing of a plane carrying Michigan missionaries in Peru. An investigation by the Office of Inspector General found that the CIA violated the law and then lied to Congress about it.
#8
Posted 2009-May-22, 19:05
inquiry, on May 22 2009, 12:47 PM, said:
It is not just Pelosi who says the CIA was less than truthful. The gist of that article (many others on internet) is:
Quote
"We cannot have a community that operates outside the law and covers up what it does and lies to Congress."
Hoekstra was reacting to the 2001 downing of a plane carrying Michigan missionaries in Peru. An investigation by the Office of Inspector General found that the CIA violated the law and then lied to Congress about it.
yes, i think there's little doubt that cia lies, most especially (perhaps) to those who are supposed to hold the reins
#9
Posted 2009-May-24, 11:33
#10
Posted 2009-May-24, 12:17
#11
Posted 2009-May-24, 17:50
Winstonm, on May 24 2009, 01:17 PM, said:
that's fine, everybody has an opinion and yours is as good as anybody else's... the question is, would you like to know in this particular instance?
#12
Posted 2009-May-24, 18:11
luke warm, on May 25 2009, 02:50 AM, said:
Winstonm, on May 24 2009, 01:17 PM, said:
that's fine, everybody has an opinion and yours is as good as anybody else's... the question is, would you like to know in this particular instance?
Jimmy, have you stopped beating your wide yet?
A simple yes or no will suffice...
#13
Posted 2009-May-24, 22:18
luke warm, on May 24 2009, 06:50 PM, said:
Winstonm, on May 24 2009, 01:17 PM, said:
that's fine, everybody has an opinion and yours is as good as anybody else's... the question is, would you like to know in this particular instance?
I completely support a total declassification of all documents relating to Gitmo, as well as all other prisons, either CIA or military, release of the latest pictures, and a justice department criminal investigation and prosecution of any wrongdoing by a member of either party as well as the CIA or the military.
I believe in the rule of law - I have made this quite clear, I believe. I could care less about political party affiliations.
#14
Posted 2009-May-25, 17:33
This is getting ridiculous. No matter which side you are on, how can you sit still when a public "leader" makes this kind of disjointed, irrational argument?
Quote
And then - as all the fear spokesmen do - he quotes as fact the non-factual.
Quote
The so-called second wave attack Gingrich referred to — an allegedly planned jumbo jet attack on the Library tower in Los Angeles (which Bush occasionally referred to as the “Liberty” tower) — has been called into doubt by intelligence officials.
Let's certainly not let truth or honesty interfere with scaring up more money for defense contractors.
#15
Posted 2009-May-25, 18:34
I believe in the rule of law - I have made this quite clear, I believe. I could care less about political party affiliations."
I am still waiting to see what rule of law the CIA does follow. How in the world is the CIA not dragged in front of the Hague?
We are told there are about 250 guys left in GITMO but there are over 600 guys at BAGHRAM. How about declassification of the killer robots the CIA uses in Pakistan. How about declassification of all the documents at both places. Lets enforce the law equally in all places, not just gitmo and selective declassification to fit some political purpose.
#16
Posted 2009-May-25, 18:45
As to who is lying, Cheney and Bush have admitted they waterboarded. CAbinet members and station chiefs admit they waterboarded. If Congressmen and women hardly ever attend oversight meetings and when they do they basically sleepwalk through them what does that tell you about how both sides care other than for political blame purposes?
#17
Posted 2009-May-26, 04:02
mike777, on May 25 2009, 07:34 PM, said:
The US has reserved the right to not extradite any US citizens to The Hague. That is how in the world the CIA is not dragged in front of The Hague.
This means that US war criminals need to be captured by third party troops, outside the USA, after they have been indicted. What do you think the odds for that are?
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#18
Posted 2009-May-26, 04:18
Quote
I know, and that makes me sick. War criminals are war criminals, and it shouldn't matter where they are from. Also governments around the world seem to act on "don't need to know" basis. I don't think we should keep all that much a secret, only that that is really necessary to be secret, like the identity and location of our secret agents.
#20
Posted 2009-May-26, 17:33