BBO Discussion Forums: Lead choice - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lead choice Which card and why?

#1 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-18, 13:24

Scoring: MP

Dealer opens 2-opps pass throughout- 3 (Albaran)-3NT-4-4NT-6NT


So Dummy appears to have a long diamond suit headed by the ace and enough extras (shortages) to try the slam.

We lead standard (4th best), but I am willing to listen to a discourse on what might be preferable.
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#2 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,779
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-18, 13:38

Al_U_Card, on Aug 18 2005, 02:24 PM, said:

Scoring: MP

Dealer opens 2-opps pass throughout- 3 (Albaran)-3NT-4-4NT-6NT 


So Dummy appears to have a long diamond suit headed by the ace and enough extras (shortages) to try the slam.

We lead standard (4th best), but I am willing to listen to a discourse on what might be preferable.

Second highest club

Prefer attitude leads versus No trump contracts.
Prefer passive leads versus 6nt and leading into the strong hand.

If partner has Ace of hearts, will owe him/her a drink at the bar:).
0

#3 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,650
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2005-August-18, 14:05

I can count on partner for some defence, else why bother? I can also count on declarer liking the layout of the black suits and (probably) the good split.

Thus I suspect that declarer can build 11 non- winners. So I need to get going here: accordingly a small seems required.

Obviously, the could be instant death to the defence: declarer needs 2 tricks (and not 3) while having to lose a trick elsewhere. However, bridge is not for the faint of heart.... no pun intended.

Had I held more scattered strength or had reason to suspect bad news in the suit, I would go passive.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2005-August-18, 14:06

Heart. Maybe it's stupid, but oh well.
0

#5 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,779
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-18, 15:16

Al_U_Card, on Aug 18 2005, 02:24 PM, said:

Scoring: MP

Dealer opens 2-opps pass throughout- 3 (Albaran)-3NT-4-4NT-6NT 


So Dummy appears to have a long diamond suit headed by the ace and enough extras (shortages) to try the slam.

We lead standard (4th best), but I am willing to listen to a discourse on what might be preferable.

It sounds to me like d are not running but this bidding is confusing me.

3D=SLAM TRY
3NT=NO
4D=WHO KNOWS, WHY NOT JUST BID 6NT HERE?
4NT=NO
6NT=WHAT? OK I GIVE UP WHAT DOES 3D, THEN 4D THEN 6NT MEAN= SOME CONFUSING GRAND SLAM TRY?

If lho has shown solid D, and I would ask what hand type LHO has shown, then agree attack with h is best, otherwise passive.
0

#6 User is offline   luke warm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,951
  • Joined: 2003-September-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Bridge, poker, politics

Posted 2005-August-18, 17:15

normally, going passive is a good idea vs. 6nt, but i'm not so sure this time.. i'd lead a low heart
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
0

#7 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2005-August-19, 04:06

low , need an agressive lead imo
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#8 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-19, 04:32

I think if the diamonds are not solid, it is even more urgent to attack aggressively. If partner is sitting with Kx behing AQJTxxx, declarer can count 6 diamond tricks if we start with a passive lead, but only one if I succeed in setting up a trick immediately.

Anyway, low heart for me.

Arend
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2005-August-19, 04:58

Mike777, the bidding means:

2C 3D
3NT 4D
4NT 6NT

3D = diamond ace, no other aces
3NT = natural
4D = long diamonds, slam try
4NT = misfit, not interested in any slam
6NT = natural
0

#10 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-19, 07:23

6D makes 7, they are off the AK of H but I led the low C so 6NT making 6. :)
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#11 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,779
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-19, 08:59

whereagles, on Aug 19 2005, 05:58 AM, said:

Mike777, the bidding means:

2C 3D
3NT 4D
4NT 6NT

3D = diamond ace, no other aces
3NT = natural
4D = long diamonds, slam try
4NT = misfit, not interested in any slam
6NT = natural

As I said, 4d is goofy followed by 6nt!
Partner declined slam twice!
We need to ask what the heck hand LHO is showing to make 2 slam tries, pard declines and then leaps to slam?
0

#12 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-19, 09:23


:) The south player was not very disciplined nor experienced
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#13 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,779
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2005-August-19, 09:40

Al_U_Card, on Aug 19 2005, 10:23 AM, said:

Dealer: ?????
Vul: ????
Scoring: Unknown
AKQ
QJxx
Qx
AKQx
Jxx
 
AKJxxxx
Jxx
 

:)  The south player was not very disciplined nor experienced

ahh precision bidding, better to play in 6nt than in 7d i c.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users