Help
And I rotated it to make south the bidder
Page 1 of 1
What would you bid?
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 376
- Joined: 2012-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Denmark
Posted 2022-September-30, 15:23
Some times, when looking at the full deal some bid seems obvious, so you get this hand without knowing if it is a bot hand or a human hand
And I rotated it to make south the bidder
And I rotated it to make south the bidder
Thorvald Aagaard
Mobile : +45 22 99 55 25
http://www.netbridge.dk
http://www.thorvald.dk
Mobile : +45 22 99 55 25
http://www.netbridge.dk
http://www.thorvald.dk
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 2017-August-10
- Gender:Male
Posted 2022-October-01, 02:00
I do not think it is obvious. What is 2♠ showing here? I guess (but not a guess) it shows an unbalanced hand and 17-20 forcing or something like that. I admit I not familiar with all sequences in 2/1. You can give simple preference with 3♦ but that seems a lesser option. But with stoppers in both the other suits and three 10s you could bid 3NT - but the good hand will be on the table.
The one bid I would not be making is 3♣. 1♦ - 1NT - 2♠ is only forcing for one round: it is not a GF.
The one bid I would not be making is 3♣. 1♦ - 1NT - 2♠ is only forcing for one round: it is not a GF.
#3
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 241
- Joined: 2022-September-10
Posted 2022-October-01, 06:10
LBengtsson, on 2022-October-01, 02:00, said:
I do not think it is obvious. What is 2♠ showing here? I guess (but not a guess) it shows an unbalanced hand and 17-20 forcing or something like that. I admit I not familiar with all sequences in 2/1. You can give simple preference with 3♦ but that seems a lesser option. But with stoppers in both the other suits and three 10s you could bid 3NT - but the good hand will be on the table.
The one bid I would not be making is 3♣. 1♦ - 1NT - 2♠ is only forcing for one round: it is not a GF.
The one bid I would not be making is 3♣. 1♦ - 1NT - 2♠ is only forcing for one round: it is not a GF.
I BID 3♣ EVEN THAT 3♦ SEEM OBVIOUSE
Michel
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,470
- Joined: 2014-February-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Italy
Posted 2022-October-01, 15:19
LBengtsson, on 2022-October-01, 02:00, said:
I do not think it is obvious. What is 2♠ showing here? I guess (but not a guess) it shows an unbalanced hand and 17-20 forcing or something like that. I admit I not familiar with all sequences in 2/1. You can give simple preference with 3♦ but that seems a lesser option. But with stoppers in both the other suits and three 10s you could bid 3NT - but the good hand will be on the table.
The one bid I would not be making is 3♣. 1♦ - 1NT - 2♠ is only forcing for one round: it is not a GF.
The one bid I would not be making is 3♣. 1♦ - 1NT - 2♠ is only forcing for one round: it is not a GF.
2♠ to me shows 5♦-4♠ or something more extreme.
I agree that 3♣ is NF and inappropriate, also that 3NT would be a pity although it is the obvious bid to most of the club.
3♥ shows exactly 3 cards and is forcing.
Page 1 of 1