BBO Discussion Forums: quick Astro question - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

quick Astro question (not Aspro, Asptro, or pin-point Astro)

#1 User is offline   pilun 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 2007-February-23

Posted 2021-December-17, 03:46

What is

(1N) - 2 - (no) - 2
(no) - 2 ?

where 2 = "hearts and a minor"
0

#2 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,152
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2021-December-17, 04:05

Doesn't exist unless you agree it to mean something.

44(50) is one possibility.
1

#3 User is offline   Douglas43 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 2020-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Man
  • Interests:Walking, boring my wife with bridge stories

Posted 2021-December-17, 05:46

View PostCyberyeti, on 2021-December-17, 04:05, said:

Doesn't exist unless you agree it to mean something.

44(50) is one possibility.


Astro isn't as fashionable as it used to be, but I like it because it allows for hands with 4 in a major and 5 in a minor.
I have discussed this sequence with my partner, and our agreement is that it shows at least three spades and a willingness to play there as advancer is quite likely to have 4 or 5 Spades.
Over 2 which shows 9+ cards in Hearts and a minor, 2 denies more than two Hearts.
Overcaller has not more than 4 Hearts (else you bid 2 over 2), and overcaller's minor suit is not Diamonds (with 4 Hearts and 5 Diamonds you would pass 2)
So, overcaller has 4 Hearts and 5+ Clubs, but is prepared to play in 2 rather than simply bidding 3
Hence either 3=4=1=5, or as Cyberyeti says 4=4=0=5. Or maybe 3=4=0=6, but I'd bid 3 with that
0

#4 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,152
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2021-December-17, 10:21

View PostDouglas43, on 2021-December-17, 05:46, said:

Astro isn't as fashionable as it used to be, but I like it because it allows for hands with 4 in a major and 5 in a minor.
I have discussed this sequence with my partner, and our agreement is that it shows at least three spades and a willingness to play there as advancer is quite likely to have 4 or 5 Spades.
Over 2 which shows 9+ cards in Hearts and a minor, 2 denies more than two Hearts.
Overcaller has not more than 4 Hearts (else you bid 2 over 2), and overcaller's minor suit is not Diamonds (with 4 Hearts and 5 Diamonds you would pass 2)
So, overcaller has 4 Hearts and 5+ Clubs, but is prepared to play in 2 rather than simply bidding 3
Hence either 3=4=1=5, or as Cyberyeti says 4=4=0=5. Or maybe 3=4=0=6, but I'd bid 3 with that


Not sure you can be that dogmatic that overcaller doesn't have diamonds, what does he do with a near double and 5 diamonds ? where he would want to raise diamonds to 3+ if partner really had them and is 4450/3451
0

#5 User is offline   Douglas43 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 2020-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Man
  • Interests:Walking, boring my wife with bridge stories

Posted 2021-December-18, 03:53

View PostCyberyeti, on 2021-December-17, 10:21, said:

Not sure you can be that dogmatic that overcaller doesn't have diamonds, what does he do with a near double and 5 diamonds ? where he would want to raise diamonds to 3+ if partner really had them and is 4450/3451


Thanks Cyberyeti, fair point and a matter of style and agreement. Personally I'd pass over 2 with anything except a 5-6 red two-suiter, where I might bid 3. In the absence of major suit agreement, I tend to stop. But sorry to sound dogmatic.
0

#6 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,152
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2021-December-18, 04:25

View PostDouglas43, on 2021-December-18, 03:53, said:

Thanks Cyberyeti, fair point and a matter of style and agreement. Personally I'd pass over 2 with anything except a 5-6 red two-suiter, where I might bid 3. In the absence of major suit agreement, I tend to stop. But sorry to sound dogmatic.


Does make it difficult, we don't tend to like to double 1N with a void in a 3 suiter, so can have quite a good hand for the Astro (we play a different variant), so we need to have a way of bidding on, if this has to be 3 that's not so terrible, but 2 feels more descriptive.
0

#7 User is offline   Douglas43 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 2020-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Man
  • Interests:Walking, boring my wife with bridge stories

Posted 2021-December-18, 08:03

View PostCyberyeti, on 2021-December-18, 04:25, said:

Does make it difficult, we don't tend to like to double 1N with a void in a 3 suiter, so can have quite a good hand for the Astro (we play a different variant), so we need to have a way of bidding on, if this has to be 3 that's not so terrible, but 2 feels more descriptive.


Your Astro bids sound a bit more, er, robust than mine tend to be...
0

#8 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,152
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2021-December-18, 08:38

View PostDouglas43, on 2021-December-18, 08:03, said:

Your Astro bids sound a bit more, er, robust than mine tend to be...


They don't have to be, but what do you do with KQxx, AQxx, (KQxxx/-) ? do you double or astro and which major do you show if you astro ?
0

#9 User is offline   Douglas43 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 2020-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Man
  • Interests:Walking, boring my wife with bridge stories

Posted 2021-December-18, 10:00

View PostCyberyeti, on 2021-December-18, 08:38, said:

They don't have to be, but what do you do with KQxx, AQxx, (KQxxx/-) ? do you double or astro and which major do you show if you astro ?


Which I would choose between Astro and double depends on both sides' vulnerability and my suit quality for the opening lead (KQxx, Axxx, KQJxx void is a more attractive double).
If I chose Astro I'd prefer 2 because the denial (next suit up denying more than two cards in the anchor major) is my 5 card suit, not a 4 card suit.
This might be down to playing more pairs than IMPs, but I tend to settle for a part-score at Astro unless my partner shows good support for my anchor major, or advances with 2NT (12+ hcp and enquiring into second suit).
This is purely personal opinion, I don't hold out as a great authority on Astro, I just like playing it.
0

#10 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,152
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2021-December-18, 10:10

View PostDouglas43, on 2021-December-18, 10:00, said:

Which I would choose between Astro and double depends on both sides' vulnerability and my suit quality for the opening lead (KQxx, Axxx, KQJxx void is a more attractive double).
If I chose Astro I'd prefer 2 because the denial (next suit up denying more than two cards in the anchor major) is my 5 card suit, not a 4 card suit.
This might be down to playing more pairs than IMPs, but I tend to settle for a part-score at Astro unless my partner shows good support for my anchor major, or advances with 2NT (12+ hcp and enquiring into second suit).
This is purely personal opinion, I don't hold out as a great authority on Astro, I just like playing it.


Can you criticise partner for bidding 2 with Axxxx, Kx, Axx, xxx as you play in 2 with 7 on ? Extreme example but ...
0

#11 User is offline   Douglas43 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 2020-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Man
  • Interests:Walking, boring my wife with bridge stories

Posted 2021-December-18, 13:17

View PostCyberyeti, on 2021-December-18, 10:10, said:

Can you criticise partner for bidding 2 with Axxxx, Kx, Axx, xxx as you play in 2 with 7 on ? Extreme example but ...


Nope. I'd laugh, say it's only one board and move on.
0

#12 User is offline   AL78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,023
  • Joined: 2019-October-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE England
  • Interests:Bridge, hiking, cycling, gardening, weight training

Posted 2021-December-18, 13:53

View PostCyberyeti, on 2021-December-18, 10:10, said:

Can you criticise partner for bidding 2 with Axxxx, Kx, Axx, xxx as you play in 2 with 7 on ? Extreme example but ...


Yes, I would expect partner to do something other than a non-forcing I-want-to-play-here-if-you-have-diamonds bid with a hand where 3NT is on if I hold a decent Astro hand.
0

#13 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,152
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2021-December-18, 14:59

View PostAL78, on 2021-December-18, 13:53, said:

Yes, I would expect partner to do something other than a non-forcing I-want-to-play-here-if-you-have-diamonds bid with a hand where 3NT is on if I hold a decent Astro hand.


Yup, me too, but it was in response to

Quote

This might be down to playing more pairs than IMPs, but I tend to settle for a part-score at Astro unless my partner shows good support for my anchor major, or advances with 2NT (12+ hcp and enquiring into second suit).
This is purely personal opinion, I don't hold out as a great authority on Astro, I just like playing it.

0

#14 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,000
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2021-December-18, 15:17

View PostDouglas43, on 2021-December-17, 05:46, said:

Astro isn't as fashionable as it used to be, but I like it because it allows for hands with 4 in a major and 5 in a minor.


Try multi-Landy (it has several names), in which double shows 4M and a longer minor.

2C both majors

2D one major

2M 5M and side minor

You lose the penalty double so we don’t play it against weak notrump

Btw, I play this in a partnership where, 20+ years ago, we played Astro
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#15 User is offline   Douglas43 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 2020-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Man
  • Interests:Walking, boring my wife with bridge stories

Posted 2021-December-19, 01:25

View Postmikeh, on 2021-December-18, 15:17, said:

Try multi-Landy (it has several names), in which double shows 4M and a longer minor.

2C both majors

2D one major

2M 5M and side minor

You lose the penalty double so we don't play it against weak notrump

Btw, I play this in a partnership where, 20+ years ago, we played Astro


Thanks mikeh. Where I live weak NT is still much more popular than strong, but if more people take up 15-17 I'll probably make that switch. I play that defence with one partner, using double for penalties over weak NT (so we do miss the 4M/5m hands).

I should also add in response to the thread above that Cyberyeti's recommendation makes sense particularly at IMPs, but (apart from Lockdown League) I just play pairs and am very focused on scrapping for part-score, even if it means missing the odd grand slam Posted Image
0

#16 User is offline   AL78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,023
  • Joined: 2019-October-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE England
  • Interests:Bridge, hiking, cycling, gardening, weight training

Posted 2021-December-19, 04:06

View Postmikeh, on 2021-December-18, 15:17, said:

Try multi-Landy (it has several names), in which double shows 4M and a longer minor.

2C both majors

2D one major

2M 5M and side minor

You lose the penalty double so we don’t play it against weak notrump

Btw, I play this in a partnership where, 20+ years ago, we played Astro


I'm playing (trying to) that with a couple of partners, but in the UK weak NT land I play double as penalties. The only issue I find with multi-Landy is there are several continuations where responder wants to force which I struggle to remember on account of the fact that the convention comes up a single digit number of times a year.
0

#17 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,194
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2021-December-19, 04:58

I think it would make sense to bid this with 3415. Just in case partner has 4-5 spades and doesn't like either of my suits.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users