billw55, on 2016-June-02, 14:43, said:
I like the idea of 1NT on the north cards.
Today I was dealt a hand similar to the north hand above. This time it was
Also IMPs, both vul. Do you open a 15-17 1NT in first seat? Or is the
♦xx a deterrent?
With 2542, you can predict 1H-1S-2D and a problem.
With 2524, 1H-1S-2C does give partner the option of 2D, but that is not a good dolution. 2D does not say, "I have 10 HCP."
So, same problem.
The 1NT solution works when you are semi balanced, but the real problem is that a jump shift is GF, meaning that a new suit rebid is 10 to about 17 or so when unbalanced. That's a huge range. Imagine the insanity of opening 2D showing 10 to 17 or so and 5H/4D or more. The range would be absurd, and yet that is what natural has.
Intermediate 2-level openings would alleviate this. E.g., 2D heart diamond, 2H heart club, and 2S spade diamond, all 10 to 13, maybe, such that a rebid is sound (14 to 17?). No one wants to give up weak twos, but this is a hidden cost to weak twos, wild ass ranges for new suit rebids.
If standard and 2/1 bidders would just use the pattern problem solution from strong club systems to solve the range problems, natural bidding would, imo, be better and easier.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.