another balancing preempt
#2
Posted 2014-March-30, 15:48
#5
Posted 2014-March-31, 14:18
If I dbl and pard signs off in 3♣ (direct or via Leb), I'm not gonna be too happy...
So 2♠ it is. If I'm right in that pard is weak, he won't go berserk over this.
#6
Posted 2014-April-01, 02:24
whereagles, on 2014-March-31, 14:18, said:
If I dbl and pard signs off in 3♣ (direct or via Leb), I'm not gonna be too happy...
So 2♠ it is. If I'm right in that pard is weak, he won't go berserk over this.
When I reason like this, partner will decide that I must be short in ♥s, but I didn't reopen with a double, so my ♠ suit is likely 6 long, and his Qxx Jxx AQxxx Kx is too good for a raise to only 3♠, so 4♠ he will say. Did I mention the 5-1 ♠ break?
I will try double to reopen, and prepare to defend that call in the following ATB inquest.
#7
Posted 2014-April-01, 06:51
Look at it this way - when we have a takeout double (usually with 2 or fewer hearts) and there has been no raise, what kind of hand do we expect partner to have? One of his most likely hand types is a fairly balanced hand with about 9 or 10 points and something in their suit, yet most of us blithely continue to treat this as a lebensohl position.
I did a quick trawl through my database for this sequence, and I don't really have time to conduct and present a full analysis, but this hand caught my eye for obvious reasons (Brink/Drijver N/S Mihov/Karakolev E/W):
3♦ made in some comfort, but you have to concede that this was a lucky outcome for E/W.
#8
Posted 2014-April-01, 07:48
PhilKing, on 2014-April-01, 06:51, said:
Look at it this way - when we have a takeout double (usually with 2 or fewer hearts) and there has been no raise, what kind of hand do we expect partner to have? One of his most likely hand types is a fairly balanced hand with about 9 or 10 points and something in their suit, yet most of us blithely continue to treat this as a lebensohl position.
I did a quick trawl through my database for this sequence, and I don't really have time to conduct and present a full analysis, but this hand caught my eye for obious reasons (Brink/Drijver N/S Mihov/Karakolev E/W):
3♦ made in some comfort, but you have to concede that this was a lucky outcome for E/W.
I presume N actually opened 2♥.
Not sure what this hand proves, even with N having a hand with lots of extra shape/offence I think 2♥ can be beaten, much of the time you'll get 200 by just passing it out.
#11
Posted 2014-April-01, 12:52
#12
Posted 2014-April-03, 17:48
#13
Posted 2014-April-04, 06:39
#14
Posted 2014-April-04, 08:17
whereagles, on 2014-April-04, 06:39, said:
How did you come up with pd holding 10-11 hcp ?
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#15
Posted 2014-April-04, 08:19