What's a Good Matchpoints Average?
#3
Posted 2013-June-28, 14:11
#4
Posted 2013-June-28, 14:15
JLOGIC, on 2013-June-28, 14:11, said:
I'm baffled that you're awake.
bed
#8
Posted 2013-June-30, 02:02
cargobeep, on 2013-June-28, 13:31, said:
Depends if the good, the bad or the ugly (aka 'in between') one is sitting in front of me
#9
Posted 2013-June-30, 08:53
Personally, I'd be happy with a consistent 50%.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#10
Posted 2013-June-30, 09:20
These averages are dependent upon whom they play against (and with). When I look at a player's "average", and don't know the actual skill level of the player, I consider jjbrr's 53.5% estimate to be a good one. There is a possibility that some extremely high averages are engineered or contrived in ways that could not happen IRL.
#12
Posted 2013-June-30, 13:14
#14
Posted 2013-June-30, 19:14
blackshoe, on 2013-June-30, 08:53, said:
Personally, I'd be happy with a consistent 50%.
Doesn't that show Bridge at Rochester is stronger?
#15
Posted 2013-June-30, 23:47
#16
Posted 2013-July-01, 00:27
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#17
Posted 2013-July-01, 00:29
Cthulhu D, on 2013-June-30, 19:14, said:
When I look around the field, I have to say no.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean