What is your preference?
Page 1 of 1
Strong Enough ...for Double then Correct?
#1
Posted 2012-July-10, 21:16
What is your preference?
Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience. George Carlin
#2
Posted 2012-July-11, 00:25
3 spades - this hand is too strong for 2 spades and you want to emphasise spades more than X > 3s would.
#3
Posted 2012-July-11, 01:19
3♠. Shows a good hand with 6+ spades, which is what you have. Second choice 2S, never double on what is basically a single-suited hand.
#5
Posted 2012-July-12, 09:44
X if we are playing Leb.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem Albert Einstein
#6
Posted 2012-July-12, 10:53
2♠. Direct actions over preempts should be sound. This hand is at the top of what I consider to be a simple overcall of a weak two bid.
One is allowed to have a little something in reserve for one's bid.
One is allowed to have a little something in reserve for one's bid.
#7
Posted 2012-July-12, 11:33
FrancesHinden, on 2012-July-11, 01:19, said:
3♠. Shows a good hand with 6+ spades, which is what you have. Second choice 2S, never double on what is basically a single-suited hand.
Of course, both 2S and 3S show a "good" hand; now we need to define "good". Strongly agree with the 3S choice on this one. We start with an assumption when simply overcalling a preempt: that partner will have some nondescript 6-9. Partner, knowing this, will pass our mere overcall if that is what she has.
This hand really would like partner to continue to game with a couple kings or somesuch, and is therefore too "good" for 2S. No jokes about the heart king, pls
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#8
Posted 2012-July-12, 12:52
2S must be a joke, if I had to choose between 2 and 4 I'd definitely go with 4.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
Page 1 of 1