BBO Discussion Forums: Default methods? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Default methods?

#1 User is offline   Balrog49 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 72
  • Joined: 2012-June-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nashua, NH
  • Interests:Music, reading, history.

Posted 2012-July-10, 14:35

Sorry if this has been asked before. I've read the help in BBO and searched the forums, but can't find the answer to what seems like an obvious question: what bidding methods are in play when you sit down at a table with an unknown partner? BBO Standard? BBO 2/1? SAYC? Your profile? His/her profile?

Barry
1

#2 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-July-10, 14:55

I am not aware of a single standard. You can make some guesses based on the flag, skill level, and other profile information. But in general it's a figure it out as you go proposition.

I find that usually it is safe to assume a north american style of opening bids, unless explicity stated otherwise in their profile. This includes 5 card majors, 15-17 notrump with simple stayman and transfers to majors, 2 strong, and maybe one or two other things. Beyond that, you will need to have a chat about it.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2012-July-10, 20:19

If they have a profile, bid based on it. That way, you can blame them when they screw up. :D

Seriously, almost every person on BBO overstate their ability. Be careful with Intermediate and some Advanced players, I have had quite a few bid 2 or 2 on 5-7 HCP and a 6-card suit. A helpful tidbit is if in their profile, they list Stayman and Blackwood, then they are going to be below average, no matter what they list themselves as.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
1

#4 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,594
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-July-11, 07:57

View Postchasetb, on 2012-July-10, 20:19, said:

If they have a profile, bid based on it. That way, you can blame them when they screw up. :D

The problem with this is if you also have a profile, and they bid based on that. You're each playing the other player's "system". :)

The simple answer is when you sit down, say something like "you're profile OK". If there's something in there that you don't like, list the exceptions.

#5 User is offline   Heron 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 2012-May-19

Posted 2012-July-15, 13:35

View Postchasetb, on 2012-July-10, 20:19, said:

Be careful with Intermediate and some Advanced players, I have had quite a few bid 2 or 2 on 5-7 HCP and a 6-card suit. A helpful tidbit is if in their profile, they list Stayman and Blackwood, then they are going to be below average, no matter what they list themselves as.


Could you expand on that? Is it that you think they're not worth mentioning, because nobody at an advanced level plays them, or something else? I basically only ever play in set partnerships anyway, but when we're looking for pickup players to play a few hands with, the number of people who pop in and then pop out again suggests that they're looking for something they're not finding, and I'm curious what.

I've never liked the BBO skill definitions much. They go from "Beginner: Someone who has played bridge for less than one year" to "Intermediate: Someone who is comparable in skill to most other members of Bridge Base Online". I think there's a lot of room in there for "has played bridge for more than a year, but still sucks".
1

#6 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,594
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-July-15, 22:41

View PostHeron, on 2012-July-15, 13:35, said:

Could you expand on that? Is it that you think they're not worth mentioning, because nobody at an advanced level plays them, or something else? I basically only ever play in set partnerships anyway, but when we're looking for pickup players to play a few hands with, the number of people who pop in and then pop out again suggests that they're looking for something they're not finding, and I'm curious what.

They're not worth mentioning because EVERYONE plays them. The fact that they feel the need to mention them specifically suggests that they don't know this simple fact.

Quote

I've never liked the BBO skill definitions much. They go from "Beginner: Someone who has played bridge for less than one year" to "Intermediate: Someone who is comparable in skill to most other members of Bridge Base Online". I think there's a lot of room in there for "has played bridge for more than a year, but still sucks".

They're very rough guidelines. And how many people would put themselves in a category that's described as "still sucks"?

#7 User is offline   Balrog49 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 72
  • Joined: 2012-June-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nashua, NH
  • Interests:Music, reading, history.

Posted 2012-July-27, 13:00

View Postchasetb, on 2012-July-10, 20:19, said:

Seriously, almost every person on BBO overstates their ability.

So I've noticed. I watch a lot on my iPhone while waiting for kids, etc., and I've seen "Expert" and even "World Class" players make horrendous mistakes. My profile is set to "Advanced" because although I've won several regionals and dozens of sectionals, I've never won a national event. Some of the "Expert" players I've watched couldn't win a national event in the U.S. in a million years.

I've had enough of sitting down with "intermediate" and "advanced" players who have no concept of the game and try to blame their bad results on me. They're not even smart enough to know how bad they are. If I have no regular partners online and want to play for 30-60 minutes, how do I get to a decent table?

Barry
1

#8 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-July-27, 13:10

View PostBalrog49, on 2012-July-27, 13:00, said:

So I've noticed. I watch a lot on my iPhone while waiting for kids, etc., and I've seen "Expert" and even "World Class" players make horrendous mistakes. My profile is set to "Advanced" because although I've won several regionals and dozens of sectionals, I've never won a national event. Some of the "Expert" players I've watched couldn't win a national event in the U.S. in a million years.

I've had enough of sitting down with "intermediate" and "advanced" players who have no concept of the game and try to blame their bad results on me. They're not even smart enough to know how bad they are. If I have no regular partners online and want to play for 30-60 minutes, how do I get to a decent table?

Barry

I suggest setting your profile to expert, then surfing the open table listing for partners who also are marked as expert. A decent size minority of them actually are; add these as friends and build up a list of preferred partners. Some of them might be willing to schedule play (such as a lunch hour); remember, they are in the same difficulties as you are.
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#9 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2012-July-29, 12:24

View PostHeron, on 2012-July-15, 13:35, said:

Could you expand on that? Is it that you think they're not worth mentioning, because nobody at an advanced level plays them, or something else? I basically only ever play in set partnerships anyway, but when we're looking for pickup players to play a few hands with, the number of people who pop in and then pop out again suggests that they're looking for something they're not finding, and I'm curious what.

I've never liked the BBO skill definitions much. They go from "Beginner: Someone who has played bridge for less than one year" to "Intermediate: Someone who is comparable in skill to most other members of Bridge Base Online". I think there's a lot of room in there for "has played bridge for more than a year, but still sucks".

This reminded me of an old thread: http://www.bridgebas...41980-slumming/
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users