BBO Discussion Forums: answer on RKC - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

answer on RKC

Poll: answer on RKC (14 member(s) have cast votes)

What do you bid

  1. 5C=1 or 4 Key cards (9 votes [64.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 64.29%

  2. 6H=Odd number of Keycards and void H (5 votes [35.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.71%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,433
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2012-May-30, 09:45

IMP's

Do you agree with Opening 4S?
Remark: You also play Namyats. 4♦ would have been AKQ 8th and maybe something next to it.
Do you have enough to bid 6H to show your void and 1 Key card?
http://bss2html.atspace.cc/
0

#2 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-May-30, 11:30

Not gonna show the void in this case. Maybe partner is trying to count winners instead of losers, or maybe I am wrong :rolleyes: .
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#3 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2012-May-30, 14:24

View Postkgr, on 2012-May-30, 09:45, said:

IMP's

Do you agree with Opening 4S?
Remark: You also play Namyats. 4♦ would have been AKQ 8th and maybe something next to it.
Do you have enough to bid 6H to show your void and 1 Key card?


-Yes i would open it 4♠

-Yes i would show my ♥ void and 1 keycard
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#4 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2012-May-30, 14:45

Yes I'd open 4S. 6H now.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#5 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,664
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2012-May-30, 17:23

p knows you dont have a side ace but there is still
a decent amount of latitude for your 4s bid anywhere
from AKxxxxxx xx xx x to QJxxxxxxx x xx x

4n by partner may merely be trying to find out if slam
is a good idea. Your having a heart void is nice but
probably not important to making slam (unless p has
long hearts and your void makes it unlikely slam will
work:))

Just cooperate with blackwood and let p decide where to
play dont try and be a hero here. Think this way--since you
have 8 spades it would hardly be a huge surprise if you
had a void.
2

#6 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-May-30, 17:59

View Postgszes, on 2012-May-30, 17:23, said:

p knows you dont have a side ace but there is still
a decent amount of latitude for your 4s bid anywhere
from AKxxxxxx xx xx x to QJxxxxxxx x xx x

Some partners might know this, and under some agreements there is latitude such as your second example. Other partners might expect a hand which more clearly has 7 to 7 1/2 tricks...Like 6 trump tricks in a seven-bagger and a bullet outside, or 8 trumps missing one card, or just seven solid. And yes, 4NT asks for clarification in that style.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#7 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2012-May-30, 23:38

Looks like a textbook vulnerable preempt - rule of 3 style.

Not sure 6♥ shows the trump Q. Which asset do you think partner wants to know about? Bidding 5♣ first doesn't necessarily shut out the ♥ control... A Trump Q ask will elicit 5♥... so we can tell partner about both...If partner fishes for the grand by bidding 5N or 6 of a minor, 6♥ will be very clear...

I might have KJ109xxxx, -, QJx, xx and still open 4♠.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
1

#8 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,433
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2012-May-31, 00:44

Thanks for the answers. Here is the full hand:

Lead was ♦4 and I finessed. RHO returned ♣K. Result: -1
- Do you agree with 4NT?
- I had no other option then play DQ?
http://bss2html.atspace.cc/
0

#9 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-May-31, 01:13

IMO, pass was correct. It was not likely ---with the lead coming thru North ---that the hand can produce five tricks to go with the seven promised if South is of that persuation. And If South is a Random 4S bidder it is just a crapshoot. In any case 4NT as Wood is unlikely to be a useful agreement after an opening 4S.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#10 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,734
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-May-31, 04:33

Here's an idea...

4♠ - 4NT
========
5♣ = side void (5♦ asks which void, 5♥ asks for key cards starting with 0)
5♦ = no void, 1 key card (5♥ asks about ♠Q)
5♥ = no void, 0 key cards (will have ♠Q)
5♠ = no void, 2 key cards without ♠Q
5NT = 2 key cards with ♠Q (if slam is not good over this you probably should not have asked)

I play a similar kind of scheme in some situations but never considered it over a 4♠ preempt before. Not sure if it is a good idea or not though - things are a little cramped.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#11 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-May-31, 06:53

If only partner had the H10 :(

I don't think 4NT is right with that N hand. You've got 3 winners, maybe two more but North clearly didn't cater to the possibility of a heart void opposite which makes slam very unlikely.

I wonder what 5S would be here? Can hardly be asking for good trumps, since we already promised those when we opened 4S!

ahydra
1
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users