BBO Discussion Forums: passable or cue? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

passable or cue?

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2012-April-12, 10:48

We had a discussion at the bar (so I don't have a hand for this)

1H-2D
3D-3S (Edit: changed typo 2D to 3D)
3NT-4H

1H=5+cH
2D=4+cD; 10+
3D=4+cD; Does not promise extra's
What is 4H?:
- Proposal to play if opener is min with pnts in C (e.g.: 4351 with slam interest)
- Cue for D
0

#2 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-April-12, 11:08

I think it depends on what 3H would have been? For example, if 3H is a cuebid, then this is probably to play (or choice of games, 4H/5D). On the other hand, if 3H is natural suggesting we play H rather than D, for example if 2D doesn't necessarily deny a H fit, then this should be a cuebid.

ahydra
0

#3 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2012-April-12, 12:21

Suppose you don't know what 3H is and even not that it is forcing :)
(That was what South told me)
0

#4 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2012-April-12, 12:26

Non-forcing slam invitation with a good doubleton heart and extra values, 4252 or 4261. Like a 4NT bid that wants to suggest hearts on the way.
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#5 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2012-April-12, 12:36

View Postlalldonn, on 2012-April-12, 12:26, said:

Non-forcing slam invitation with a good doubleton heart and extra values, 4252 or 4261. Like a 4NT bid that wants to suggest hearts on the way.

I didn't get support at the bar. Happy I get it her from our star :rolleyes:. I thought that 4 as control for was very unlikely (Why not 4 or 4 then?) and I thought that 4 was passable. ("some" support from you because I didn't think it showed a 2c).
0

#6 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,134
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2012-April-12, 14:28

View Postkgr, on 2012-April-12, 10:48, said:

We had a discussion at the bar (so I don't have a hand for this)

1H-2D
2D-3S
3NT-4H

1H=5+cH
2D=4+cD; 10+
3D=4+cD; Does not promise extra's
What is 4H?:
- Proposal to play if opener is min with pnts in C (e.g.: 4351 with slam interest)
- Cue for D

How long have you been at the bar?

What is 3S after the insufficient 2D?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
0

#7 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2012-April-12, 16:05

View Postjillybean, on 2012-April-12, 14:28, said:

How long have you been at the bar?

What is 3S after the insufficient 2D?
I changed it to 3D :)
0

#8 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2012-April-12, 20:19

I was thinking 3S -> ostensibly inviting 3NT, but after pulling, 4H sounds like "a cuebid for diamonds, and 3S was a cuebid too even though it didnt sound like it at the time."

I remember a bunch of posts in the past where jdonn played a whole lot of 4M bids as non-forcing slam invitations / encouraging COGs where it wouldn't have occurred to me to do it that way. It makes quite a bit of sense here, but isn't what I'd assume without discussion.
0

#9 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,699
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-April-19, 08:14

I think a 3 rebid should be natural and 4 is then either Kickback (if played) or a cue bid (if not).
(-: Zel :-)
0

#10 User is offline   BillPatch 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 457
  • Joined: 2009-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hilliard, Ohio
  • Interests:income taxes, american history, energy

Posted 2012-April-19, 23:12

View PostZelandakh, on 2012-April-19, 08:14, said:

I think a 3 rebid should be natural and 4 is then either Kickback (if played) or a cue bid (if not).

If I had agreed with a 3 rebid, I would think my 4 a game suggestion.

I assume you meant that after the original auction 4 would be defined as you stated.
0

#11 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,699
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-April-20, 00:50

View PostBillPatch, on 2012-April-19, 23:12, said:

I assume you meant that after the original auction 4 would be defined as you stated.

That is correct. I was answering the two points raised by the OP, that he did not know what a 3 rebid would have been and what 4 should be on the 3rd round. As far as I am aware the auction 1 - 2; 3 - 3; 4 was never raised but yes, I would agree with your interpretation of it, a minimum opener unexcited by the double-fit.
(-: Zel :-)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users