BBO Discussion Forums: Is this an obvious lead? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is this an obvious lead?

#1 User is offline   jschafer 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 2010-October-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK
  • Interests:Origami, squash, table tennis, travelling

Posted 2011-March-13, 08:18

2NT-AP

♠KJ84
♥KT65
♦Q87
♣T8

Do you consider the lead obvious? If so what is it?
0

#2 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2011-March-13, 09:35

All suits stinks, so nothing is obvious.

I'll lead a spade. Should give me a fair chance of not being endplayed the next time I'm on lead.

I consider it marginally better than picking a random suit.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.

Gnasher
0

#3 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-March-13, 10:19

Spade too. Wins when pard has an honor and can set 4 tricks for our side with a bit of luck.
0

#4 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2011-March-13, 10:57

No it's a long way short of obvious.

I'd lead a heart. I'm experimenting with the algorithm "when all other things are equal lead your weaker 4-card suit from two broken holdings" and so far it's working quite well.
0

#5 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2011-March-13, 11:43

"Do you consider the lead obvious? Yes.
"If so what is it?" The obvious.
Slightly prefer a heart.
The only pin-my-hat on clue is no major xfer, no Stayman.
LEAD a MAJOR.
0

#6 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2011-March-13, 12:06

I have no clue at all and no simulator available for a week to come :(
0

#7 User is offline   TMorris 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 270
  • Joined: 2008-May-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2011-March-13, 12:43

10 clubs for me following my rule of leading from rubbish into a (very) strong NT hand
0

#8 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2011-March-13, 22:57

It is auto ♣T for me. No need to create tricks to 2NT declarers (as well as 4NT declarers)
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
0

#9 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2011-March-13, 23:44

View PostMrAce, on 2011-March-13, 22:57, said:

It is auto ♣T for me. No need to create tricks to 2NT declarers (as well as 4NT declarers)

Ditto for me.
http://bridgethoughts.blogspot.com
0

#10 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,249
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-March-14, 03:58

Hi,

The lead is certainly not obvious.

I would go with a major suit, and I would say I take a spade,
but clubs is also ok.

You are bound to give declarer a trick, so I would pick the
suit, that offers the best prospect of developing tricks for our
side, my strongest suit is spade.

The only suit, that I would not lead is diamonds, and I think
spades is better than hearts.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#11 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2011-March-14, 04:44

♣10 was what I thought of first. Against 2NT (or a NT contract where one of the hands is VERY strong and the other not so much or one of them invited and the other didn`t accept, and sometimes when they did) it might be better to lead passively so that declarer has to lead from his hand/holdings and not us towards his.

But it's not an obvious lead.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#12 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2011-March-14, 05:56

I would lead a small ♥, though anything could be right.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#13 User is offline   Poky 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 508
  • Joined: 2003-July-18
  • Location:Croatia

Posted 2011-March-14, 06:25

Spade if IMP-s, club if MP-s.
0

#14 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2011-March-14, 06:51

Quote

Spade if IMP-s, club if MP-s.


I don't believe there are many (if any) situations where the first lead should be different at IMP's and MP's. Those usually include leading from 6+carders hoping for not too likely layouts providing a set but which usually gives up a trick.
Here we don't have such situation. Blowing up spade trick is likely to cost as much at IMPs as it is at MP's imo.
0

#15 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-March-14, 08:05

♥ is the most logical choice for me, but it's not obvious at all.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#16 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2011-March-14, 14:17

Club, in an effort to avoid giving declarer anything. The choice is by no means clear and can backfire in several ways, but so can any other lead since we don't have a clue in which suit partner has help.
0

#17 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-March-14, 15:59

Agree with Frances and have had the same positive experience about leading from the weaker of two four card suits.

Its a small sample size for me so I'm not going to claim my evidence is anything more than anecdotal.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#18 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-March-14, 17:41

T♣ for me...maybe declarer rattles off AKQJX, AKQ of ♦, when a major suit lead would have set, but c'est-la-vie...
foobar on BBO
0

#19 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2011-March-14, 17:56

I would lead a heart.

I would be happy to make a passive lead against a 2NT-all-pass auction, from a 4 small suit for example. The doubleton ten doesn't seem that safe to me though, so if I can't make a safe lead I would prefer to try to set up some tricks.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#20 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2011-March-14, 17:59

Small Heart for me.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users