My thoughts:
First, I like something that involves transfers after transfers. The simpler version I have used I called Minor Suit Smolen.
Second, that's not critical here. Although it gains in the sense of right-siding, using 3D to agree clubs is as efficient as using 3D to agree diamonds.
Third, I would reserve 3♦ to agree whichever minor 3♣ shows. I want to reserve the other major as natural after a 3♣ second suit call, to cater to 5431's. I would use the other major to agree whichever suit 3♦ shows. If Responder has a 5431 holding with the minor that 3♦ shows, hopefully we use 3♣ as a specialized puppet that allows showing 5-3/3-5 in the majors.
If partner bids 3♦ in this sequence, then it makes some sense to play 3♥ and 3♠ as a probe/cue ambiguous, bidding the other major as a cue/probe and the same major as a probe/cue for the unshown minor. I would tend to isolate the cue meaning (or shape), but I may tend toward overly slam oriented in an auction like this.
With the actual hands, Opener would be able to bid 3♥ as a natural call, showing the fifth heart. Had Opener held one fewer hearts and one more club, he'd bid 3♦, showing club support. Responder could then bid 3♥ as a cue (or NT probe) or 3♠ as a diamond cue/probe.
Lacking that technique, I agree that Responder should limit out at 3NT. If 3♥ was natural, then 3♠ should agree hearts, IMO, and be a cue (two top spades, heart support, slammish). If 3♥ was a cue/probe, then 3♠ would seem to be a cue in furtherance of the implied club fit, and clearly too strong an action.
Just checking
#21
Posted 2007-October-09, 21:06
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#22
Posted 2007-October-10, 03:05
mikeh, on Oct 9 2007, 11:32 PM, said:
That's a bad rule, imo.
You can file your complaint with Ron Klinger, which is where I got it from
Anyway, just to clear it out, bidding a stopper doesn't necessarily mean 100% misfit. Just that the hand prefers to try for 3NT before embarking on the minor suit game/slam. So I guess we play it more or less the same way in the end.. lol.
#23
Posted 2007-October-10, 09:10
I have a question for those with more experience with transfer extensions:
1N - 2♥ - 2♠ - 2N - 3♥
Do you think this promises 5 hearts? I would think so, since opener can just accept with clubs and cue later if necessary.
1N - 2♥ - 2♠ - 2N - 3♥
Do you think this promises 5 hearts? I would think so, since opener can just accept with clubs and cue later if necessary.
"Phil" on BBO
#24
Posted 2007-October-10, 11:19
It seems like over 1nt-2♥-2♠-2nt(clubs):
3♣ = shows club fit
3-red = no fit, values in the bid suit, worried about other red suit
3♠ = shows spade fit
3NT = strength in the reds, no fit, want to play 3NT most of the time
After 1nt-2♥-2♠-2nt-3♥, responder bids 3NT with diamond cards. Note that this denies holding three hearts, and is frequently a heart singleton (5-1-3-4). If responder bids something other than 3NT (to deny diamond cards) then 4♥ by opener can show the five hearts.
Typically I actually play relay in these auctions instead of natural followups though.
3♣ = shows club fit
3-red = no fit, values in the bid suit, worried about other red suit
3♠ = shows spade fit
3NT = strength in the reds, no fit, want to play 3NT most of the time
After 1nt-2♥-2♠-2nt-3♥, responder bids 3NT with diamond cards. Note that this denies holding three hearts, and is frequently a heart singleton (5-1-3-4). If responder bids something other than 3NT (to deny diamond cards) then 4♥ by opener can show the five hearts.
Typically I actually play relay in these auctions instead of natural followups though.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit

Help
