Fluffy, on Oct 7 2007, 02:55 PM, said:
I think you missed the point of 1♠ (and others)s Mike, you had a 2♦ opening avaible to show both majors and under-opening strenght, being vulnerable it seemed to me a strong option, but nobody seems to think the same.
TooToo state that pass is "unplayable" in some "standardish" agreed format simply seems closed minded.
Pass is out of the picture.
TooToo state that pass is "unplayable" in some "standardish" agreed format simply seems closed minded.
Pass is out of the picture.
Fluffy, I think if you are going to play 2d showing both majors vul, then you need to define what that means. Based on what you wrote it seems it could mean whatever you want it too. I see nothing wrong with pass, if you agree, pass is fine with this hand.
In other words yet another post on what an opening hand shows.

Help
