Let's start from here. There will be more later.
Another 6-5 Pointed vs. Round
#2
Posted 2006-February-03, 02:33
I am afraid to bid spades, because they could recognize their slam possibilities thanks to spades void(s), for our own offence/defence i need to know how the diamonds are. May be I'll bid 3♦ and bid spades later (if ever). I cut my partner from the bidding (he is missing of some information), but i don't see a better solution.
If I play Snapdragon double (3-card fit and 5+cards in the last suit) I would use it (imho it's obviously the best bid)
#3
Posted 2006-February-03, 03:54
#4
Posted 2006-February-03, 05:19
you have to decide, if the diamonds are good
enough to warrant a 3D / 4D fit bid, if not just
bid 4S.
Also important: Decide now, what you will do if
5H comes back, I will bid 5S, but Pass over
anything higher.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2006-February-03, 06:03
P_Marlowe, on Feb 3 2006, 12:19 PM, said:
you have to decide, if the diamonds are good
enough to warrant a 3D / 4D fit bid, if not just
bid 4S.
Also important: Decide now, what you will do if
5H comes back, I will bid 5S, but Pass over
anything higher.
With kind regards
Marlowe
I agree !
♦ are not good enough to bid 4♦ and reveal the distribution to opps so I will go with 4♠.
What to do if it's back with 5♥ is another problem but I will also try 5♠ even if it can push them to 6♥
What do I do on 6♥ ? Euh ???
Alain
#6
Posted 2006-February-03, 06:20
partner suit is a bit lousy so either hes hefty on pts or shapes or hes got a 6s (unlikely) or hes got clubs well placed.
It very unlikely (almost impossible) we buy the hand at 4s. We must plan a 5 or 6 level scenario.
Defending 6h by underleading a spades might work.
6C might face a bad break esp since they wont play me for club lenght (if i dont splinter).
plan 1 is to bid 5s and if they bid 6H ill lead diamond
plan 2 is
Its would be somewhat nice to know if the opp have a s void.
ill bid a simple 2s if they drive to slam showing a s void ill bid 6S. If not ill underlead my spades against 6H and ill let them play 6C
white against red you have to take the push to 6s if they bid 6 and know waht there doing.
Against weak players i might try a 3s followed by a 4s bid. You never know
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#7
Posted 2006-February-03, 07:15
#8
Posted 2006-February-03, 12:58
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2006-February-03, 13:48
There is a 0% chance to buy it in 4♠ they may have a slam or we may have a slam, the exclusion RKCB bid will help me find a slam if we have one and will make it very hard to bid a slam if they have one.
The choice between the honest 5♣ and the devilish 5♥ will depend to me on the state of the match, the opponents and atmospheric pressure.
Luis
#10
Posted 2006-February-03, 18:51
I've got a suspicion I should just focus on the spades, but I keep picturing normal opening hands from partner like x AQxx Kxx AQJxx that belong in diamonds.
(*Not at the table--I don't want my team docked the 3 IMPs.)
#11
Posted 2006-February-03, 23:26
almightygozar, on Feb 3 2006, 07:51 PM, said:
I've got a suspicion I should just focus on the spades, but I keep picturing normal opening hands from partner like x AQxx Kxx AQJxx that belong in diamonds.
(*Not at the table--I don't want my team docked the 3 IMPs.)
It is an uncontested auction, otherwise the oppos bid would be shown in brackets.
3♦ appears to be the only bid: pard finds 3♥
#12
Posted 2006-February-04, 01:42
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#13
Posted 2006-February-05, 06:55
I bid 4♣ to show shorten if it is.
i don't want to bid 4♦ because my hand need ♦+♥control only,not ♦ honor card.I expect my pd's hand is QJxxx Axx x Axxx,a perfect slam.
#14
Posted 2006-February-05, 07:42
asuming the auction is uncontested,
3D, artificial (fourth suit forcing /
mark time bid, what ever you call it).
You have no real chance to introduce
diamonds, but maybe you get the info,
that partner holds a 3 card spade suit.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#15
Posted 2006-February-05, 17:27
1♣-(P)-1♠-(P)-2♥-(P)-3♦-(P)-3♥-(P)-?
Some additional clarifications:
- 2♠ would not have been 100% forcing
- 3♦ is nominally a 4th Suit Forcing (but can well be with diamonds, as in this case)
- 3♥ is 100% 6-5 in the round suits.
What do you bid?
#16
Posted 2006-February-05, 18:52
Kalvan14, on Feb 5 2006, 06:27 PM, said:
1♣-(P)-1♠-(P)-2♥-(P)-3♦-(P)-3♥-(P)-?
Some additional clarifications:
- 2♠ would not have been 100% forcing
- 3♦ is nominally a 4th Suit Forcing (but can well be with diamonds, as in this case)
- 3♥ is 100% 6-5 in the round suits.
What do you bid?
After this start, 3S. Partner now has 3NT, 4C, 4H and 4S to tell what his two yet undescribed cards are. It makes sense for him to bid 3NT and 4S not only with two cards in diamonds and spades respectively, but also with a stiff honor.
Say partner has 1. x - AKJ9x - x - AKJ9xx, 2. _ - AKJ9x - xx - AKJ9xx. What game do you prefer ?
#18
Posted 2006-February-06, 01:46
Kalvan14, on Feb 5 2006, 06:27 PM, said:
1♣-(P)-1♠-(P)-2♥-(P)-3♦-(P)-3♥-(P)-?
Some additional clarifications:
- 2♠ would not have been 100% forcing
- 3♦ is nominally a 4th Suit Forcing (but can well be with diamonds, as in this case)
- 3♥ is 100% 6-5 in the round suits.
What do you bid?
4S, I have done enough,
and I try to get out.
With regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)

Help

1C - 1S - 2H - ?