Help
I think that 3H should treated as angling for 3NT, so it's a choice between pass and 4H. I think I would risk 4H, but it's close.
Responding To Pre-empt
#22
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 2012-March-15
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-June-03, 09:07
I think that PASS is the best action at matchpoints.
We will miss 4♥ if partner has the somewhat unlikely combination of at least 2♥ and at most one ♣ but partner is more likely to have at most one ♥ and at least 2♣.
5♦ (or 3NT) would require even less likely holdings.
We will miss 4♥ if partner has the somewhat unlikely combination of at least 2♥ and at most one ♣ but partner is more likely to have at most one ♥ and at least 2♣.
5♦ (or 3NT) would require even less likely holdings.
#23
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 973
- Joined: 2013-February-24
- Gender:Male
- Location:Dundee Scotland United Kingdom
- Interests:Occasional chess player. Dominoes
Posted 2015-June-03, 12:32
ArtK78, on 2015-June-03, 07:14, said:
Far be it for me to defend Phil, but he specifically states that "if partner is following the rule of 2 and 3" meaning at this vulnerability the opening 3♦ bid shows 7 playing tricks in diamonds. So, there is something to be said for bidding 5♦, but it assumes that you have no duplication of values. Many hands that will make 11 tricks in diamonds will make 10 tricks in hearts. There are certainly some that produce 11 tricks in diamonds but do not produce 10 tricks in hearts, but I am not going to expend what few brain cells I have left in constructing them. I would guess that all of them have one or no hearts in the diamond bidder's hand.
The rest of his post - about 4th hand having a rock crusher - is pure gibberish given your hand. I suppose one could construct a hand where the opps can make 10 or 11 tricks in a black suit, but it is EXTREMELY unlikely.
The rest of his post - about 4th hand having a rock crusher - is pure gibberish given your hand. I suppose one could construct a hand where the opps can make 10 or 11 tricks in a black suit, but it is EXTREMELY unlikely.
"I would guess that all of them(constructed hands) would have one or no hearts in the diamond bidder's hand" Exactly the reason why 3♥
is such a ludicrous bid. Who's to say that the remaining ♥ could be bunched together in an opponents hand? Then the next thing you will
hear is "DOUBLE" (maybe or maybe not in a voice of thunder,impossible in 'silent bidding') After the dust settles,you had better have a good
excuse for a furious partner.
"It is not enough to be a good player, you must also play well"
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
#24
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 2015-February-11
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-June-03, 14:56
4hts next pls
#25
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2015-June-03, 18:40
zillahandp, on 2015-June-03, 14:56, said:
4hts next pls
I guess that settles that. Nothing to see here.
#26
- Group: Admin
- Posts: 4,858
- Joined: 2009-July-26
- Gender:Female
- Location:bucharest / romania
Posted 2015-June-03, 18:41
ArtK78, on 2015-June-03, 18:40, said:
I guess that settles that. Nothing to see here.
LOL
Wd have upvoted, but it might confuse people
#27
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 60
- Joined: 2014-November-18
Posted 2015-June-03, 20:02
NEVER EVER JUMP over a pre - that should be a control ask - 3H forcing and 4H over 4D any hand with ak dam has a play daffydic
#28
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2015-June-04, 04:57
daffydoc, on 2015-June-03, 20:02, said:
NEVER EVER JUMP over a pre - that should be a control ask
This is an interesting point. But it is not standard. I play that all jump responses to preempts are control asks, so to get to 4 of a major after a 3 of a minor preempt, one has to bid 3 of a major (forcing) first.
I would never assume that a jump to 4 of a major was a control ask without prior agreement with partner.
#30
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Location:Göttingen, Germany
- Interests:bye
Posted 2015-June-05, 02:16
Now passing can also be masterminding? smh
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#31
- 5-level belongs to me
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,128
- Joined: 2004-August-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glasgow Scotland
- Interests:Poems Computers
Posted 2015-June-05, 07:02
eagles123, on 2015-June-02, 11:33, said:
#32
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 878
- Joined: 2009-June-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Australia
Posted 2015-June-05, 09:04
I think the field forces to game on this hand (with or without a 3D opening), so i'm going to stick with them for now and bid 3H.
Passing isn't unreasonable and could easily be the technically best choice (eg. if the last making spot is 3H), but if that is the case we might only be salvaging an average.
Passing isn't unreasonable and could easily be the technically best choice (eg. if the last making spot is 3H), but if that is the case we might only be salvaging an average.
#33
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2015-June-05, 09:28
WesleyC, on 2015-June-05, 09:04, said:
I think the field forces to game on this hand (with or without a 3D opening), so i'm going to stick with them for now and bid 3H.
Passing isn't unreasonable and could easily be the technically best choice (eg. if the last making spot is 3H), but if that is the case we might only be salvaging an average.
Passing isn't unreasonable and could easily be the technically best choice (eg. if the last making spot is 3H), but if that is the case we might only be salvaging an average.
I voted for 3♥. But I agree that passing is also very reasonable at MP.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
Matchpoints
partner is quite agressive but wont have junk at these colours