Can someone help me regarding hand shape of the 1nt(forcing) hand after partner opens 1M ?
I think I need to know hands that do not have 3+ card support for partners opening major and not 4♠
Thanks
Page 1 of 1
I need some help with numbers/stats
#1
Posted Today, 10:23
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#2
Posted Today, 12:49
AI Overview
The 1NT forcing response by the responder typically shows an unbalanced hand with (6-12) HCP that lacks 3-card support for the opener's major.
Because it serves as a "dustbin" bid for hands that cannot make another natural response at the 2-level, it can be of any shape (balanced, semi-balanced, or completely distributional).
Typical Shape Characteristics No 3-card support: Responder does not have enough length in the opened major to raise partner.No 4-card major unbid: If partner opened 1heart, responder does not hold a 4-card spade suit (otherwise, they would bid 1\spade).
Distributionally awkward: The hand shape makes bidding a new suit impossible without jumping, or the hand is not strong enough for a standard game-forcing 2/1 bid (e.g., 10-11 invitational points.
The 1NT forcing response by the responder typically shows an unbalanced hand with (6-12) HCP that lacks 3-card support for the opener's major.
Because it serves as a "dustbin" bid for hands that cannot make another natural response at the 2-level, it can be of any shape (balanced, semi-balanced, or completely distributional).
Typical Shape Characteristics No 3-card support: Responder does not have enough length in the opened major to raise partner.No 4-card major unbid: If partner opened 1heart, responder does not hold a 4-card spade suit (otherwise, they would bid 1\spade).
Distributionally awkward: The hand shape makes bidding a new suit impossible without jumping, or the hand is not strong enough for a standard game-forcing 2/1 bid (e.g., 10-11 invitational points.
#3
Posted Today, 14:31
To further elaborate on Dave s nice summary, these hands bid 1NT over 1H.
Qxx
Ax
Jxxx
xxxx
Jxx
x
QJxxxx
Axx
And same here over 1S.
xx
Qxxxx
Axx
Kxx
-
Kxxx
xxxx
AJxxx
They all met the criteria re no support, less than 4S over 1H, and no strung enough to bid 2 (or 3) something of a cheaper suit. Yet you have some bal, some semi-bal and some very distributional.
Qxx
Ax
Jxxx
xxxx
Jxx
x
QJxxxx
Axx
And same here over 1S.
xx
Qxxxx
Axx
Kxx
-
Kxxx
xxxx
AJxxx
They all met the criteria re no support, less than 4S over 1H, and no strung enough to bid 2 (or 3) something of a cheaper suit. Yet you have some bal, some semi-bal and some very distributional.
#5
Posted Today, 16:16
I'm asking the wrong question, I want to know the likelihood of the distributions, specifically, having 2 clubs
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
Page 1 of 1

Help

