Did you foresee this?
we don't have the systems
#1
Posted Yesterday, 16:43
Did you foresee this?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#3
Posted Yesterday, 17:10
Without methods you need to do something extreme.
#4
Posted Yesterday, 17:17
a) strong 6+♣
b) 3xx6 strongish
c) 4xx5 GF
Opener bids 3♣ weak or 3♦ GF to ask
#5
Posted Yesterday, 17:29
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 16:43, said:
Did you foresee this?
Tough. Very tough even with a toy.
Why? It is a bit too good for my toy
A bit too weak for strong 2C
Looks like the old fake reverse time, with 2D
At least I can find out if partner has five spades....
I hope, smile
Option 2 is open a strong 2C, I don't play it 100% GF
#6
Posted Yesterday, 18:57
5/24 AX and 1/12 BCD players got there, I'm not going to lose any sleep on this one.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#7
Posted Yesterday, 20:41
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#8
Posted Yesterday, 20:46
A borderline hand ..
At MP you don't want to easily give on spades, just yet.
At imps easier just bid 3C. Natural and gf for me.
All around a deal that does not fit nicely into the structure..
#9
Posted Yesterday, 21:04
#10
Posted Yesterday, 21:13
This is the only hand we failed to communicate, the rest of the game went well.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#11
Posted Today, 00:54
1♣ - 1♥/♠ playing TW or not
2N - 3♦ GF asking
3♠ 3xx6
3♣ would be weak and is passable.
Now the choice of whether to bid 4♣ or 4♠.
I tend to go for the Major, but with an 8-card vs. 10 card fit its a tough call.
4♣ will set trumps and start off key card showing, while 4♠ passes the buck to partner. 5♣ is odd keycards with K♣ setting ♠ as trumps.
For reference 2♦ by opener is the more balanced reverse enabling a stop in 2M by responder when 5M 0~6 playing TW. Note: the reverse here will be 18+ as we break the transfer to 1N (15-17) playing TW.
#12
Posted Today, 02:27
Bridge World would repeatedly put similar hands into its monthly bidding challenge and ask experts for their rebid using BW Standard. They would not have done this if there was a consensus amongst the experts, so I don't think most players should worry about it - just do whatever seems sensible and a number of experts will be supportive.
p
#13
Posted Today, 03:15
2: Our multi is 6+ cards in second seat, so P then 2♠ over (our 4+ cards) 1♣ is this hand, suit reqs not as important by a passed hand.
3: at the club, any slam will score well, so I want to be in 6♣ which survives 4-1♠
#14
Posted Today, 04:15
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 21:13, said:
This is the only hand we failed to communicate, the rest of the game went well.
For me, the responding hand is a clearly worth committing to at least a small slam holding ♣KQ. What kind of hand is partner bidding 5♣ with missing the ♣KQ. Of course, what kind of partner would jump to 5♣ after a 1 level response?
#15
Posted Today, 08:47
Cyberyeti, on 2026-February-16, 03:15, said:
2: Our multi is 6+ cards in second seat, so P then 2♠ over (our 4+ cards) 1♣ is this hand, suit reqs not as important by a passed hand.
3: at the club, any slam will score well, so I want to be in 6♣ which survives 4-1♠
North has a great hand if playing Multi 2M 5 card or Multi/Muierberg but disallowed at all levels here.
johnu, on 2026-February-16, 04:15, said:
Yes, in imp I may bid 6
Other than 5C how does opener proceed, other than a manufactured 2D reverse? This is why I ask the question and the hand is still known as the BW Death hand.
I will ask a few of the 6/36 pairs who got to 6 how they did it
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#16
Posted Today, 09:09
#17
Posted Today, 09:16
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 16:43, said:
We did, as a consequence of last year's BB mixed pairs final
Now our Multirever can handle this and more.
jillybean, on 2026-February-15, 20:41, said:
P - 1♣
1♠ - 2♦(NAT or various strong hands)
2♥(positive) - 3♦ (5+♣, 3=♠)
3♠(FIT) - 4♣(CTL)
5♣(CTL,!♦,!♥,!even) - 6♠
P
West knows about the bombproof 9+ card clubs fit: I would stick to spades rather than raise clubs, but push to 5♣ to get the message across.
East knows we lose the first trick in hearts.
#18
Posted Today, 09:36
the rest of it is too much system for me at the moment
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#19
Posted Today, 09:37
pescetom, on 2026-February-16, 09:16, said:
Now our Multirever can handle this and more.
P - 1♣
1♠ - 2♦(NAT or various strong hands)
2♥(positive) - 3♦ (5+♣, 3=♠)
3♠(FIT) - 4♣(CTL)
5♣(CTL,!♦,!♥,!even) - 6♠
P
West knows about the bombproof 9+ card clubs fit: I would stick to spades rather than raise clubs, but push to 5♣ to get the message across.
East knows we lose the first trick in hearts.
ooops, South forgot to open 2H, North might compete to six.
#20
Posted Today, 09:39
mike777, on 2026-February-16, 09:37, said:
A little too weak for South to open 2H, even for me
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred

Help
