Blackwood after 1 nt
#2
Posted 2025-September-30, 05:20
cencio, on 2025-September-30, 04:36, said:
1N-4N says bid 6 with a max, pass with a min (known as quantitative)
1N-2♣-any-4N and 1N-2red-complete transfer-4N work the same way
Some people play gerber 1N-4♣ to ask aces
Otherwise take it slowly and keep making forcing bids
#3
Posted 2025-September-30, 05:43
After any suit bid, 4NT asks for keycards with the agreed suit (or the last bid suit if none is agreed) as trumps.
After most notrump bids, 4♣ asks for aces.
#4
Posted 2025-September-30, 06:10
cencio, on 2025-September-30, 04:36, said:
It is known as a quantative raise. It asks partner to pass with a minimum and to advance with a maximum.
The bots don't do it, but it is a sound idea to make this "non forcing Blackwood" instead to prevent 6 on 32 HCP missing 2 aces when you play with a human partner.
If you want forcing RKCB start with a transfer, Stayman or minor suit ask combined with a force first.
https://www.bridgeba...ystem_notes.php
#5
Posted 2025-September-30, 07:37
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#6
Posted 2025-September-30, 11:28
1. We have a known fit. Partner does not necessarily have to know the suit (unless using RKCB) but we should know.
2. We know we have enough playing strength for 12 tricks.
3. (optional) We are not missing a side suit A-K in a suit where we do not have a shortage.
4. We do not hold a void.
When these 3 criteria are satisfied, Blackwood is appropriate to make sure we are not missing 2 cashing aces. What Blackwood is not is a slam try. A 4NT response to 1NT is a slam try though, asking Opener if they hold a maximum. Now once upon a time, when it was somewhat more difficult to set trump suits after a 1NT opening, there was a convention developed to ask for aces. It was specifically for hands with a long suit giving a known fit. This convention is called Gerber, a 4♣ response with similar follow-ups to simple Blackwood a few steps lower. But in modern systems, the vast majority now play transfers, which by and large have made Gerber obsolete. But id you really want a direct ace ask after 1NT, this is the way. Just ask yourself if that is really the most effective usage of 3 full bidding levels before placing the card.
#7
Posted 2025-September-30, 11:50
#8
Posted 2025-September-30, 12:31
#10
Posted 2025-October-01, 08:53
I think more generally there is a lot of room for improvement on standard if responder wants to show a slam try in a specific suit. However, it is good to learn what common options are most widely played first, and then deviate from that as you please in agreement with your partner.
#12
Posted 2025-October-01, 14:59
Cyberyeti, on 2025-October-01, 11:02, said:
We play 1N-2♦-2♥-4♠ as ace asking so 4N casn still be quantitive
I'd probably just bid 4N and ignore the five card major. I like your method of using an otherwise redundant 4♠ bid after the transfer, then 4N can be quantitative and opener with a should I shouldn't I strength hand can judge based on their holding in partner's major.
#13
Posted 2025-October-01, 15:01
jillybean, on 2025-September-30, 07:37, said:
But not from random players in an Italian club either, as OP probably is doing

[I am still traumatized from my first day in a real bridge club, when the president invited me to play with her and reassured me "let's play everything natural", which was a bit vague but a relief. First hand, I looked at my 15 HCP 4333 and opened 1NT with some doubts, then comfortably passed her 4NT. "Are you crazy???" she shrieked, and I wondered uncomfortably if this sport was for me]
#15
Posted 2025-October-01, 20:51
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#16
Posted 2025-October-01, 21:32
pescetom, on 2025-October-01, 15:01, said:

[I am still traumatized from my first day in a real bridge club, when the president invited me to play with her and reassured me "let's play everything natural", which was a bit vague but a relief. First hand, I looked at my 15 HCP 4333 and opened 1NT with some doubts, then comfortably passed her 4NT. "Are you crazy???" she shrieked, and I wondered uncomfortably if this sport was for me]
Well, my "standard" is natural to me.
You need thick skin to endure this game. How quickly players forget how complicated this game is and the steep learning curve for those playing duplicate for the first time.
blackshoe, on 2025-October-01, 20:51, said:
And the ones I give you the evil eye as I put the bidding card on the table, and tap it with my index finger.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#19
Posted 2025-October-02, 06:51
WasWinM, on 2025-October-02, 06:30, said:
It is the only method we have to show slam interest. It takes a long time and a good partnership to develop decent bidding methods.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#20
Posted 2025-October-02, 12:41
jillybean, on 2025-October-02, 06:51, said:
Some of our eternal beginners will hang onto the bidding box after bidding game.
More worldly intermediates will hunch forwards expectantly or raise their hand from below the table.
I see the way they use Blackwood more as blame transfer: "we were missing only one Ace and there was no room to ask Kings".