Help
♥AK9743
♦K87
♣T9
Your partner, first to bid, starts with 1club, opponent pass, you bid 1 heart, opponent
Thanks!
Page 1 of 1
what would you bid
#1
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 2022-December-01
Posted 2023-November-09, 21:50
♠86
♥AK9743
♦K87
♣T9
Your partner, first to bid, starts with 1club, opponent pass, you bid 1 heart, opponentjumps in bids 1 spade. Your partner doubles (support), opponent pass. What is your bid?
Thanks!
♥AK9743
♦K87
♣T9
Your partner, first to bid, starts with 1club, opponent pass, you bid 1 heart, opponent
Thanks!
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,188
- Joined: 2021-February-13
- Gender:Not Telling
- Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
Posted 2023-November-09, 22:49
Opponent jumps in 1♠?
You have enough for 4♥
You have enough for 4♥
#3
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 2022-December-01
Posted 2023-November-09, 23:31
mw64ahw, on 2023-November-09, 22:49, said:
Opponent jumps in 1♠?
Sorry, I am editing it
thanks for the answer
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,188
- Joined: 2021-February-13
- Gender:Not Telling
- Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
Posted 2023-November-10, 02:30
You have enough for 4♥ after revaluation 15tp the way I play.
With an invitational hand in ♥ some may have a direct 3♥ bid rather 1♥
I go via 1♦ with a 3♥ rebid to show this hand if opener is minimum.
With an invitational hand in ♥ some may have a direct 3♥ bid rather 1♥
I go via 1♦ with a 3♥ rebid to show this hand if opener is minimum.
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,127
- Joined: 2014-June-01
Posted 2023-November-10, 11:54
You have a 6-cd suit headed by AK and a side K (who, furthermore, is not in opp’s suit where it would look badly placed). Plenty enough to confidently bid 4H, sure of a fit* (see below).
Partner is warned at the same time, should they have extras, that you don’t consider slam.
In all cases, partner should not be too minimal for this X. I don’t thing trying to stop on a dime a 3H is winning strategy.
A quacky 4333 12-HCP should avoid Xing. We are forcing responder to bid when they could have only 4 hearts and a min hand, so we need to have a playable spot somewhere.
X should show an elegant hand (at least 13-14 5332 with no wated S honors, or 5431 with playable suits, should responder since opener forced us to bid), sometimes only 2-cd support* and e.g. no S stopper.
Partner is warned at the same time, should they have extras, that you don’t consider slam.
In all cases, partner should not be too minimal for this X. I don’t thing trying to stop on a dime a 3H is winning strategy.
A quacky 4333 12-HCP should avoid Xing. We are forcing responder to bid when they could have only 4 hearts and a min hand, so we need to have a playable spot somewhere.
X should show an elegant hand (at least 13-14 5332 with no wated S honors, or 5431 with playable suits, should responder since opener forced us to bid), sometimes only 2-cd support* and e.g. no S stopper.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,875
- Joined: 2014-February-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Italy
Posted 2023-November-10, 13:34
apollo1201, on 2023-November-10, 11:54, said:
Plenty enough to confidently bid 4H, sure of a fit* (see below).
To confidently bid (legitimate since Star Trek) but not to bid confidently (with evident confidence in absence of screens).
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,374
- Joined: 2010-November-21
Posted 2023-November-10, 13:56
I play that double is mandatory on every hand with 3 hearts and every other call denies 3 hearts, so apollo's assumptions don't apply to me.
I'm only bidding 3♥ at MPs. I'd be willing to bid 4 if I had a spade singleton.
At IMPs, I'll bid 4 if red or behind or in a Swiss against weaker opps.
I'm only bidding 3♥ at MPs. I'd be willing to bid 4 if I had a spade singleton.
At IMPs, I'll bid 4 if red or behind or in a Swiss against weaker opps.
#8
- Group: Members
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 2008-November-26
Posted 2023-December-03, 16:40
3H. This is an invitational strength hand. But 4H, vul at IMPS is a reasonable risk.
Page 1 of 1