Have a go at making PAR Use your own system
#1
Posted 2022-November-10, 08:01
#3
Posted 2022-November-10, 08:42
1♦-2♦ (inverted not denying 4M, inv+)
2N(15+ GF)3♦ (could have asked with an art 3♣ so no 4M)
3♥-3♠ (both stops, from this point on with E holding ♠Q and W known not to have 4M he knows the spades are a control)
4♣-4N (heart control, no second spade control, 4♥ would be kickback, extras or would bid 4♦)
6N (actually knows from his hand that W must have at least 6 diamonds as has a club control missing the AK and no 4M)
Is just possible partner has Axx, KJx, AQxxxx, x or Axx, Kx, AQxxxxx, x and you have 13 off the top
With W dealing:
1♦-2♦ (as above)
2N (15+ GF, it's worth this once partner supports ♦)-3♣(art ask, partner can still have 4 hearts)
3♦ (diamonds only)-3♥(stop)
3♠(stop)-4♣(cue)
4♦(minimum for auction, but better than 5♦)-4♥(kickback)
4N(1/4)-5♣(Q?)
5♥(yes and ♥K)-6N
#5
Posted 2022-November-10, 09:43
ali quarg, on 2022-November-10, 08:57, said:
AQxxxx is vast when you know partner has 4, it's not quite AQxx and 2 aces but it's more than a king better than AQxx in a 12 count, even discounting the ♣Q I would GF, what do you need ? Ax, QJxx, Kxxx, xxx is plenty for 5♦, either major suit ace plus Kxxx, and the club K or A will also do for 3N most of the time (almost all of it if you have the ♣Q).
#6
Posted 2022-November-10, 13:11
Cyberyeti, on 2022-November-10, 08:42, said:
1♦-2♦ (inverted not denying 4M, inv+)
2N(15+ GF)3♦ (could have asked with an art 3♣ so no 4M)
3♥-3♠ (both stops, from this point on with E holding ♠Q and W known not to have 4M he knows the spades are a control)
4♣-4N (heart control, no second spade control, 4♥ would be kickback, extras or would bid 4♦)
6N (actually knows from his hand that W must have at least 6 diamonds as has a club control missing the AK and no 4M)
How does West know that East already knows that West has a spade control?
#7
Posted 2022-November-10, 14:05
I don’t know acolyte so can’t offer any advice if one is constrained by having to use that method
I do know 2/1 but that doesn’t help much since 3/1 is not a ‘system’: it is an underlying philosophy. For instance, using 2/1 doesn’t mean that one is always using inverted minors nor, if one is, that one has a standard set of later actions
With one partner I’d open 1D and partner would bid 2D, limit or better
Turn opener, in our methods, bids 2H as an artificial game force. Without going into detail, I’d expect a fairly smooth auction to 6N
With another partner I’d open 2C and partner would bid 2S, showing either 5-8 or about 12 hcp, balanced with no major or any hand with primary diamonds
Opener bids 2N, responder transfers to 3D and then bids 4H, keycard
Once again I expect to reach 6N but on that auction there is a slight risk of playing 6D. Since I’m primarily an imp player, I would not love reaching 6D but I wouldn’t be too upset. At mps, I’m sure we’d bid 6N even if we felt some uncertainty about the stiff club
#8
Posted 2022-November-10, 14:05
I don’t know acolyte so can’t offer any advice if one is constrained by having to use that method
I do know 2/1 but that doesn’t help much since 3/1 is not a ‘system’: it is an underlying philosophy. For instance, using 2/1 doesn’t mean that one is always using inverted minors nor, if one is, that one has a standard set of later actions
With one partner I’d open 1D and partner would bid 2D, limit or better
Turn opener, in our methods, bids 2H as an artificial game force. Without going into detail, I’d expect a fairly smooth auction to 6N
With another partner I’d open 2C and partner would bid 2S, showing either 5-8 or about 12 hcp, balanced with no major or any hand with primary diamonds
Opener bids 2N, responder transfers to 3D and then bids 4H, keycard
Once again I expect to reach 6N but on that auction there is a slight risk of playing 6D. Since I’m primarily an imp player, I would not love reaching 6D but I wouldn’t be too upset. At mps, I’m sure we’d bid 6N even if we felt some uncertainty about the stiff club
#9
Posted 2022-November-10, 16:30
The hand is far from ideal for Italian 2/1 without inverted diamonds, but it would probably go:
_______ 1♦(4+)
2♣(GF) - 2♥(4+)
4♦(fix) - 4♥(ctl)
4♠(ctl) - 5♣(ctl, odd KC)
6♦(play) - ?
East might pass that for safety at IMPs, but at MPs with substantial extras we were unable to show, a huge diamonds fit and safety in the other suits it seems reasonable to convert to 6NT.
#10
Posted 2022-November-10, 17:12
1♣ - 1♠ GI
1NT Balanced 12-14/18-19 - 2NT ♦ transfer
4♣ 18-19 SI control - 4♠ 1/3 KCs ♠ control 2+ ♦ honours. (4♦ would deny 2+/3)
4NT ♥ control - 5NT K♥
6NT I can count the tricks
#11
Posted 2022-November-10, 22:58
I think it is probably easier to reach 6NT if East opens 1♦ here, and Acol players are playing inverted minors. If they are not, then again it could be more difficult imo.
#12
Posted 2022-November-13, 02:49
nullve, on 2022-November-10, 13:11, said:
He doesn't but without one E would likely bid 4♦ here rather than the more committal 4N as he's unlikely to have enough extras in the context of a diamond slam, remember he's already stretched somewhat with his GF, QJx is not a great holding and is the only possible one that is not a control.