For the curious:
Lucky, Unlucky, Right, or Wrong Rebid evaluation
#1
Posted 2021-September-19, 09:35
For the curious:
#2
Posted 2021-September-19, 11:10
#3
Posted 2021-September-19, 11:21
Partner must have felt lucky, though, that you didnt bid 1S, what would his rebid have been? Ag least opening 1D looks safer as it leaves a 2C rebid open, barring the relative suit strengths. He knew with a 16-count 1444 that hed likely have to lie at some stage in the auction, but opening 1C seems to put a bad start in what promises to be a shaky auction.
Lots would have opened a strong NT, if they dont play weak
#4
Posted 2021-September-19, 11:26
#5
Posted 2021-September-19, 11:57
Coincidently I would have opened this hand with 1♦ as I have no rebid after the likely 1♠ response.
#6
Posted 2021-September-19, 12:22
paulg, on 2021-September-19, 11:57, said:
Coincidently I would have opened this hand with 1♦ as I have no rebid after the likely 1♠ response.
The rebid after 1S would have to be 1NT
#9
Posted 2021-September-19, 12:57
paulg, on 2021-September-19, 11:57, said:
1♦ is bog-standard in Italy when holding 4-4 minors.
I understood that playing 'Better Minor', 1♦ would be preferred with 11-15hcps and a singleton (considering the black suits here I would downgrade to that).
#10
Posted 2021-September-19, 15:11
#11
Posted 2021-September-19, 16:13
AL78, on 2021-September-19, 15:11, said:
You can't get back to hand often enough. You lose 2 spades and 2 clubs unless I missed something.
#12
Posted 2021-September-19, 17:47
This post has been edited by nige1: 2021-September-19, 19:28
#13
Posted 2021-September-19, 18:36
#14
Posted 2021-September-19, 19:34
Winstonm, on 2021-September-19, 16:13, said:
#15
Posted 2021-September-19, 22:32
nige1, on 2021-September-19, 19:34, said:
Sorry for showing the hands in the wrong position and for being dense, but the only way to win cheaply in hand is with the K. You can try the 9 but it doesn't work. If you ruff twice, you will lose a natural trump trick because you are ruffing with two high trumps.
I've corrected the north-south orientation so maybe that was the problem. This is the correct situation.
#16
Posted 2021-September-20, 00:40
Yeah you get unlucky sometimes.
#18
Posted 2021-September-20, 13:16
AL78, on 2021-September-19, 15:11, said:
So would I, but unfortunately BBO is still forgetting a promise.
#19
Posted 2021-September-20, 14:13
I've corrected the north-south orientation so maybe that was the problem. This is the correct situation.
++++++++++++++++++++
Thank you WinstonM, for correcting the layout of your intriguing problem..
On the given defence, with the actual layout, 4♥ is unlucky to fail If the declaring side held ♥7, game prospects would be better
It's hard to allow for such considerations, during the auction
#20
Posted 2021-September-20, 19:10
nige1, on 2021-September-20, 14:13, said:
I've corrected the north-south orientation so maybe that was the problem. This is the correct situation.
++++++++++++++++++++
Thank you WinstonM, for correcting the layout of your intriguing problem..
On the given defence, with the actual layout, 4♥ is unlucky to fail If the declaring side held ♥7, game prospects would be better
It's hard to allow for such considerations, during the auction
Yes, and in the play it's easy to overlook the necessity of at least trying the 9 when the heart comes back. If the heart 10 is with east, the contract makes.