BBO Discussion Forums: Interesting(?) BIT-appeal - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 6 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Interesting(?) BIT-appeal

#81 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,603
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-March-06, 10:42

I think it's also unrealistic to expect players to express their reasoning in percentages that could be compared with sim results.

Read MSC- and CtC-type columns, they generally use vague logic like "I think slam is at worst on a finesse" or "I hope partner will be able to supply a stopper". And these are some of the best players in the world.

#82 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,707
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2020-March-06, 16:48

No, no, no. They're required to express percentages, to four significant figures. B-)
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#83 User is offline   sanst 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 874
  • Joined: 2014-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deventer, The Netherlands

Posted 2020-March-07, 03:03

View Postblackshoe, on 2020-March-06, 16:48, said:

No, no, no. They're required to express percentages, to four significant figures. B-)

:lol: :lol:
Joost
0

#84 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2020-March-07, 04:49

View Postblackshoe, on 2020-March-06, 16:48, said:

No, no, no. They're required to express percentages, to four significant figures. B-)

Digits? (Not figures?) :lol: :D :P
0

#85 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,707
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2020-March-07, 17:17

View Postpran, on 2020-March-07, 04:49, said:

Digits? (Not figures?) :lol: :D :P

Oxford American Dictionary said:

figure | ˈfiɡyər |
noun
1 a number, especially one which forms part of official statistics or relates to the financial performance of a company: official census figures | a figure of 30,000 deaths annually from snakebite.
• a numerical symbol, especially any of the ten in Arabic notation: the figure 7.
• one of a specified number of digits making up a larger number, used to give a rough idea of the order of magnitude: their market price runs into five figures | [in combination] : a six-figure salary.
• an amount of money: a figure of two thousand dollars.
• (figures) arithmetical calculations: she has no head for figures.

--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#86 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2020-March-07, 20:49

View Postblackshoe, on 2020-March-07, 17:17, said:

Oxford American Dictionary said:


Fair enough but (slightly) different from what my Oxford Guide to the English Language says. :P
0

#87 User is offline   sanst 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 874
  • Joined: 2014-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deventer, The Netherlands

Posted 2020-March-08, 02:38

View Postpran, on 2020-March-07, 20:49, said:

Fair enough but (slightly) different from what my Oxford Guide to the English Language says. :P

America isn’t England, hasn’t been for almost 250 years. It’s a miracle that the languages don’t differ much more. Dutch Dutch and South African Dutch, better known as Afrikaans, have grown far more apart in a slightly shorter time span. I know, totally and completely OT.
Joost
0

#88 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,707
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2020-March-08, 05:15

"Two peoples separated by a common language…" B-)
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#89 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2020-March-08, 08:22

View Postpran, on 2020-March-07, 04:49, said:

Digits? (Not figures?) :lol: :D :P

The term I was taught is “significant figures” as opposed to “decimal places”. Looking online, that still seems to be valid usage.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
1

#90 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2020-March-08, 09:43

View Postgordontd, on 2020-March-08, 08:22, said:

The term I was taught is “significant figures” as opposed to “decimal places”. Looking online, that still seems to be valid usage.

Just for curiosity I looked up my Webster (American language) where I found some 14 entries for the noun.
Most relevant seemed to be "symbol for a number" or "amount"
0

#91 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,965
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted 2020-March-08, 10:07

View Postgordontd, on 2020-March-08, 08:22, said:

The term I was taught is “significant figures” as opposed to “decimal places”. Looking online, that still seems to be valid usage.


I too was taught that term, but the only difference I can see with respect to "decimal places" is an explicit reminder that we are rounding to a sufficient level of accuracy (so it's reasonable to express the generic frequency of an 8500 shape as 0.00% to two significant places, even knowing that it is 0.0031%).
0

#92 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,603
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-March-08, 14:27

View Postgordontd, on 2020-March-08, 08:22, said:

The term I was taught is “significant figures” as opposed to “decimal places”. Looking online, that still seems to be valid usage.

"Decimal places" just refers to the digits after the decimal point. "Significant figures" is the total number of digits. 123.45 has 5 significant figures and 2 decimal places.

#93 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2020-March-09, 01:29

View Postbarmar, on 2020-March-08, 14:27, said:

"Decimal places" just refers to the digits after the decimal point. "Significant figures" is the total number of digits. 123.45 has 5 significant figures and 2 decimal places.

or 123.45 is a figure which has 5 significant digits and 2 decimal places. :rolleyes:
0

#94 User is offline   sanst 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 874
  • Joined: 2014-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deventer, The Netherlands

Posted 2020-March-09, 02:44

View Postpran, on 2020-March-09, 01:29, said:

or 123.45 is a figure which has 5 significant digits and 2 decimal places. :rolleyes:

Since we are completely OT, I think it’s high time we discuss when to use number or figure. Please, don’t restrict yourself to natural numbers, complex, rational, real are far more interesting.
Joost
0

#95 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2020-March-09, 04:01

View Postsanst, on 2020-March-09, 02:44, said:

Since we are completely OT, I think it’s high time we discuss when to use number or figure. Please, don’t restrict yourself to natural numbers, complex, rational, real are far more interesting.

Well, for what it's worth: To me number is a concrete term, figure is an abstract term. They can both be used about measurable quantities.
0

#96 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2020-March-09, 05:41

View Postbarmar, on 2020-March-08, 14:27, said:

"Decimal places" just refers to the digits after the decimal point. "Significant figures" is the total number of digits. 123.45 has 5 significant figures and 2 decimal places.

Yes. My point was that I was taught "s.f." at the same time as being taught "d.p." It sounds to me as though perhaps Pran was taught "s.d." instead of "s.f."
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#97 User is offline   RMB1 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,841
  • Joined: 2007-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Exeter, UK
  • Interests:EBU/EBL TD
    Bridge, Cinema, Theatre, Food,
    [Walking - not so much]

Posted 2020-March-09, 06:10

View Postpran, on 2020-March-09, 01:29, said:

or 123.45 is a figure which has 5 significant digits and 2 decimal places.


What you say may be logical but at school many of us were taught a distinction between decimal places and significant figures, and tedious exercises rounding numbers to 3d.p. (decimal places) or to 4s.f. sigificant figures.
Robin

"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
1

#98 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2020-March-09, 07:48

Which gets us back on topic again:
If you use a poll of 4 people whether 1 in 6 (or 1 in 5) players would chose an action, the result will have 0 (zero) significant figures.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#99 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2020-March-09, 08:51

View Postgordontd, on 2020-March-09, 05:41, said:

Yes. My point was that I was taught "s.f." at the same time as being taught "d.p." It sounds to me as though perhaps Pran was taught "s.d." instead of "s.f."

Indeed.

A significant number to me refers to one (or more) 'significant' number(s) within a set of numbers, not to the internal properties of any particular number.

So if you for instance consider the population (expressed as a number) of the US states you might end up ranking the states according to their significance.
There you have an example of significant numbers.

Examples:
98765,43210 is a 10-digit number with 5 decimals.
98765,4321 is the same number with only 4 significant decimals (note the omission of the last zero!).
98765 is the same number with 5 significant digits.
and 99000 is again the same number with only 2 significant digits. (note the rounding of the thousands!)
0

#100 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,603
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2020-March-09, 09:18

Scientists often solve this by writing most numbers using scientific notation. 9.876543210 x 10^4 versus 9.9 x 10^4. The number of significant figures is always decimal places + 1.

  • 6 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users