how to bid
#2
Posted 2017-December-29, 13:15
Needs one of two red suit hooks I think. Even without Q♦ have a shot.
On non-heart lead makes with no hooks.
#4
Posted 2017-December-30, 02:58
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#6
Posted 2017-December-30, 09:28
patroclo, on 2017-December-30, 07:23, said:
Many who play "feature relay" show a side A or K at the 3 level if the hand is not minimum, and a shortage at the 4 level. 3 of the major is for minimal hands.
This relay is used for hands who want to investigate game or slam ig opener has a good (and fitting) hand.
Othe relays exist too. And even "feature relay" can have different follow-ups too. Mr Ace will probably explain better than I do
#7
Posted 2018-January-04, 08:23
South ascertains at a safe level that opener has the Ace of trumps plus the K of clubs and can now place the best contract.
#8
Posted 2018-January-04, 08:49
2S2NT
3H**6NT
#9
Posted 2018-January-04, 09:00
steve2005, on 2017-December-29, 13:15, said:
Needs one of two red suit hooks I think. Even without Q♦ have a shot.
On non-heart lead makes with no hooks.
6N by S makes regardless of hooks (You table Q♦ and whether it wins or loses you have 6+1+3+2)
6♠(N) is better than 1 of 2 in that you can try to ruff down the other heart honour before taking the diamond finesse or playing a squeeze on a heart lead unless it's single, but you want to be in 6N.
#10
Posted 2018-January-04, 11:48
If you play some form of Ogust, it probably goes something like this:
2S 2NT(1)
3H(2) 4NT(3)
5D(4) 5NT(5)
6C(6) 6NT(7)
(1) Ogust - asking about opener's hand
(2) Good hand (for a weak 2); bad suit
(3) Key card
(4) One (or 5C if you play 1430)
(5) Have any Kings?
(6) Yes, Kc
(7) well, with the Kc, better to have the lead come up to the red suit tenaces.
Cheers,
mike
#11
Posted 2018-January-04, 19:06
and suddenly counting to 12 tricks should be no worse than the odds of making game opposite a dead minimum. We can safely choose 6n because of our double club stop and this can be beneficial to play of the hand because we might be able to delay tackling the spades (and the extra entry to the N hand) in nt.
#12
Posted 2018-January-05, 14:38
patroclo, on 2017-December-30, 07:23, said:
There are 2 basic ways 2 NT is used by a partnership over a weak 2 bid. In both cases, 2 NT is forcing for 1 round. One asks for a "feature" which is normally a side A or K. The other is the Ogust convention which asks the weak 2 bidder to describe his weak 2 bid by some artificial rebids. The rebids to Ogust are:
3 ♣ - bad hand, bad suit
3 ♦ - bad hand, good suit
3 ♥ - good hand, bad suit
3 ♠ - good hand, good suit
Which method that any partnership uses is by prior partnership agreement. Both methods are widely used among good players, so it's difficult to say that either should be preferred.
If you are playing "feature", as many have indicated, your proper response should be 3 ♣ showing the ♣ K. The actual hand looks like a fairly normal weak 2 bid -- 1 1/2 QTs, 9 HCP and decent suit, so you should show the feature. The only time you shouldn't show a feature is when you've opened a subnormal weak 2 bid, then you simply rebid your weak 2 bid suit. So if "the devil made you do it" and you bid 2 ♠ on something ♠ 1098xxx ♥ xx ♦ Qx ♣ K10x, then the proper rebid over the feature request would be 3 ♠. Obviously, if you don't have any feature, you also just rebid the weak 2 suit. That alerts partner that either have no outside feature or have a bad hand. In most cases that will help partner/responder decide what to do next.
If you are playing "Ogust", with a fairly normal weak 2 bid, you'd choose to rebid either 3 ♥ or 3 ♠ showing a "good" hand. Most normal weak 2 bid agreements are for a couple top honors in the weak 2 suit, so I'd probably opt for a 3 ♥ with actual hand you asked about. Maybe some dedicated Ogust users could provide some better insight into the proper response. As for the subnormal example I provided, that bid would be an easy 3 ♣ rebid -- bad hand, bad suit.
#13
Posted 2018-January-05, 15:23
Why is the hand so good? ♠ KQJ are sure to solidify 2 ♠ opener's suit. Even if opener's suit were ♠ 765432, there'd be a 68% chance of only 1 loser in ♠. Anytime opener holds the ♠ A there should be no losers. In addition, the hand has the 3 outside As including ♥ AQ (1 1/2 QTs), that amounts to a total of at least 6 1/2 tricks to cover potential losers in the 2 ♠ bidder's hand. If the weak 2 bid is made on as little as ♠ A and something additional, there's a great possibility that 11-12 tricks will be available.
After a 3 ♣ response to "feature" or a 3 ♥ response (good hand/bad suit) to "Ogust", chances of slam got even better and responder can continue with the agreed A asking bids. Note that responder can see there are not 2 quick losers in any suit and two As are not missing so A asking is OK.
#14
Posted 2018-January-05, 16:20
rmnka447, on 2018-January-05, 15:23, said:
Why is the hand so good? ♠ KQJ are sure to solidify 2 ♠ opener's suit. Even if opener's suit were ♠ 765432, there'd be a 68% chance of only 1 loser in ♠. Anytime opener holds the ♠ A there should be no losers. In addition, the hand has the 3 outside As including ♥ AQ (1 1/2 QTs), that amounts to a total of at least 6 1/2 tricks to cover potential losers in the 2 ♠ bidder's hand. If the weak 2 bid is made on as little as ♠ A and something additional, there's a great possibility that 11-12 tricks will be available.
After a 3 ♣ response to "feature" or a 3 ♥ response (good hand/bad suit) to "Ogust", chances of slam got even better and responder can continue with the agreed A asking bids. Note that responder can see there are not 2 quick losers in any suit and two As are not missing so A asking is OK.
Your maths is up the spout, 68% chance of a 3-2 break is correct, but not with only 4 missing, you will have a 6-3 fit.
#16
Posted 2018-January-07, 03:18
#17
Posted 2018-January-10, 15:33