Preempt or not Interesting hand
#1
Posted 2016-June-21, 15:20
♠-- ♥QJx ♦Jxxx ♣KJT8xx
.
Question one: what is your bid?? Do you preempt? If you play preempts rule 2 and 3 can you afford a "little lie"?
.
.
.
Question two: If opener passed, how bidding should go? Pard was dealt: AT9 AK98x AKx Ax
.
I ask this is because I'd have no clue how to bid this hand if I as opener passed and pard shows balanced 22-24 HCP.
Thank you in advance!
#2
Posted 2016-June-21, 15:37
3c=6c?
or if you prefer:
3c=4d(rkc in c)
4s=4nt( qc ask)
5c=6c
#3
Posted 2016-June-21, 15:41
#4
Posted 2016-June-21, 16:00
Starting with (2C-2D)-2N (22-24), I think MSS then punting 5C over the 3NT response might suggest a hand like this. Opener has truly excellent controls so can raise to 6.
ahydra
#5
Posted 2016-June-21, 16:04
How about:
2N-3♣ (5 card stayman)
3♥(5♥)-4♠(exclusion)
5♣(1/4)-6♣(bid 7♥ with Q♣)
6♥
Yes 6♣ is better than 6♥, but I think 6♥ is where I end up.
#6
Posted 2016-June-21, 16:27
Notice how easy getting to slam is after preempting.
Pass just doesn't exist for me.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2016-June-21, 16:40
Phil, on 2016-June-21, 16:27, said:
Notice how easy getting to slam is after preempting.
Pass just doesn't exist for me.
It's very easy to get to the slam on this hand, and no you don't bid 3♣-6♣ as 7 can easily be a spread, but the issue is that if first in you regularly preempt on hands like this, you will miss 6 opposite a bit less, miss 7 opposite hands of this strength on a regular basis, and play in clubs when you want to be somewhere else too often.
I will preempt on hands like this, but this particular one, playable in 3 suits without great clubs doesn't look right.
#8
Posted 2016-June-21, 19:34
On top of all of that I actually have a good club suit, not great but good for this vul.
#9
Posted 2016-June-21, 19:55
As dealer, I pass
After Pass-Pass I open 2C
After Pass-Pass-2C-Pass I bid 3C.
Then the 2C bidder rebids 3H over 4C. Dealer now holds one fine hand but I am inclined to think 4H suffices. The 2C opener, knowing of my hearts and my clubs, will find his way to 6.
I don't preempt with that hand, I just don't. I know others do. Holding the big hand, it is big enough for me to start with 2C. Back to the dealer. Even if 2M over 2C shows two of the top three (not everyone agrees that it should) you cannot be that restrictive with a 3C call over 2C. After 2C-2D you never get to show clubs. If it goes 2C-2D-2NT then 3C is Stayman, if it goes 2C-2D-2M then 3C is, for most, a second negative. If you are ever going to bid 3C to show a decent club suit and some values, it has to be over the 2C. I am assuming here that 2C-2D is waiting. For those that play 2C-2D as a positive response of some unknown shape, things might be different.
I guess I can make 7H if clubs and hearts are both 3-2, but they may not be and then 6C is safer than 6H. Bidding as I did, we probably end in 6H. Big deal. When we have eight card fits in both hearts and clubs, missing the Q in clubs and missing nothing in heart we probably end in hearts. If we are skilled enough, maybe we can work it out but as for me, probably not. There is some danger of landing in 7H. Might make, but I would just as soon forego the pleasure.
As I say, the above is my way, probably not a common way. I don't think it is crazy.
Oh. If I am playing with someone who opens this 3C I probably would just bid 6C. Presumably 3H over 3C is forcing, but partner would raise 3H to 4H without nearly such good support so, lacking a food way to find out, I probably just leap to 6C.
#10
Posted 2016-June-21, 21:44
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
Posted 2016-June-21, 22:17
Cyberyeti, on 2016-June-21, 16:40, said:
I will preempt on hands like this, but this particular one, playable in 3 suits without great clubs doesn't look right.
I don't disagree, but if you always look at preempts as potential slam hands in off suits, you won't preempt very often.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#12
Posted 2016-June-21, 23:08
Oceanss, on 2016-June-21, 15:20, said:
♠-- ♥QJx ♦Jxxx ♣KJT8xx
.
Easy 3♣ at this vul. (and even when all white FWIW). Over 3♣, we play that 4♦ is a five step ask for the number of key cards in the suit and outside controls (A/K) using the 0, 1, 1 (1 and one outside), 2, 2 (2 and two outside) scale, and we'll likely end up in 6♣
#13
Posted 2016-June-22, 00:00
A 3C opener might be reasonable in third position but as dealer is as likely to screw up partner as the oppo.
#14
Posted 2016-June-22, 00:30
Oceanss, on 2016-June-21, 15:20, said:
♠-- ♥ Q J x ♦ J x x x ♣ K J T 8 x x
Question one: what is your bid?? Do you preempt? If you play preempts rule 2 and 3 can you afford a "little lie"?
Few play "rule of 2/3" nowadays. I rank
- 3♣ = PRE. Heed Terence Reese's advice "A pre-empt known to be weak is a blunt sword". As MIke777 points out, opening 3♣ on this hand simplifies slam bidding.
- Pass = NAT. Pusillanimous.
Oceanss, on 2016-June-21, 15:20, said:
♠ A T 9 ♥ A K 9 8 x ♦ A K x ♣ A x
I think you still reach a round-suited small slam. The auction might start:
2♣ - 3♣
3♥ - 4♥
#15
Posted 2016-June-22, 02:55
Phil, on 2016-June-21, 22:17, said:
My point is that I have no reason to suspect that it's my opponents' hand, I'm close to average points and playable in 3 suits with more defence than I would like. Partner is too likely to take a phantom.
In 3rd seat it's an obvious preempt.
#16
Posted 2016-June-22, 05:28
Opposite my 4♣, I'd bid 5.5♣, planning to apologise to P either way.
Opposite most people's 3♣ I'd bid 3♥ and prob end in 6.
Opposite pass, I'd take my P to a nursing home. You bunch of cravens
#17
Posted 2016-June-22, 06:02
Jinksy, on 2016-June-22, 05:28, said:
Opposite my 4♣, I'd bid 5.5♣, planning to apologise to P either way.
Opposite most people's 3♣ I'd bid 3♥ and prob end in 6.
Opposite pass, I'd take my P to a nursing home. You bunch of cravens
A good way to find out just how active an old person can be is to try to take him to a nursing home!
Back to the bidding. I had noted that if partner opened 3C and I held the big hand I would probably just bid 6C but I think I have changed my mind and, as you suggest, go with the 3H call. We can always get to 6C if need be. That club ten is important for playing 6C since it means you can survive a 4-1-split either direction, and with the 8 you can even survive a 5-0 split. if on the correct side. But those cards will not always be there, especially if partner is open to imaginative preempts. Playing in hearts, you probably get a spade lead, ruffed, diamond to hand, ruff a spade, cash the remaining heart in dummy, come to hand with a club. If hearts are 3-2 you are home, if not then there is still the possibility of a doubleton Q of diamonds or, as a last resort, the club finesse. If we are sure 3C shows the KJT then I imagine 6C is a safer bet, but I am getting the idea modern preempts make no such promise. Note that if the weak had holds only Qxx of hearts it comes to the same thing.
Nice of the opponents to stay out of the bidding with their ten card heart fit. This seems to up the chances for 3-2 splits. Maybe we should be in 7H. Win the spade lead, two rounds of hearts leaving the Q on the board, A, K ruff a clb hight, back to the board, runs club s. Not difficult and not really that unlikely.
One more thought. Whether we are to play n 6C or 6H, that heart holding in the weak hand is important. Give the weak hand QJx of spades and a heart void, and 6C may still make, but it gets iffier. And iffier still if the spades are Qxx
#18
Posted 2016-June-22, 06:10
mike777, on 2016-June-21, 15:37, said:
3c=6c?
or if you prefer:
3c=4d(rkc in c)
4s=4nt( qc ask)
5c=6c
I prefer a direct 6c.
Even if p has the queen I don't see a way to find a good grand slam. And even if he doesn't have the king, I probably still want to be in 6.
#19
Posted 2016-June-22, 06:38
helene_t, on 2016-June-22, 06:10, said:
Even if p has the queen I don't see a way to find a good grand slam. And even if he doesn't have the king, I probably still want to be in 6.
I want to be in 7 if partner has ♣KQ and ♥Q, and I think I can probably find that out.
If partner has ♣KQxxxxx any heart holding except xxx is probably OK, and even that may be OK if they don't lead a spade and partner has a stiff diamond.
#20
Posted 2016-June-22, 09:26
As per the LTC theory,which I play,I shall open the 22 points hand only 1H.( I open 2C only on at least a balanced 23+ or a hand which has 9 or more winners
with a major suited hand and10 or more winners with a minor suit hand).The further bidding does not require much explanation as the hand given has 7 and half losers due to nice 3 card support.I t therefore,as a passed hand,is certainly worth a response of 2C followed later by heart support showing bid.We shall land in 6 hearts after finding the absence of club Queen by using the Spiral RKCB.