BBO Discussion Forums: IMP, E-W Vul, what do you bid? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

IMP, E-W Vul, what do you bid?

Poll: IMP, E-W Vul, what do you bid? (32 member(s) have cast votes)

What is your bid?

  1. 3♣ (13 votes [40.62%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.62%

  2. 3♥ (4 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  3. 3♠ (6 votes [18.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.75%

  4. 4♦ (7 votes [21.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.88%

  5. 4♥ (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. 5♦ (2 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Wayne_LV 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 180
  • Joined: 2003-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Henderson, NV
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker

Posted 2016-May-14, 11:23


0

#2 User is offline   apollo1201 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,130
  • Joined: 2014-June-01

Posted 2016-May-14, 11:43

Partner has some kind of 1354 with 15-17 HCPs. All our honors are working, but slam is unlikely (x AQx AKxxx KJxx is a max and so-so slam). It is IMPs so 5D.
0

#3 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2016-May-14, 11:58

While slam is unlikely, what's the rush? Opener may be 0364. - Axx AKxxxx KQJx. With a possible misfit he may choose not to jump to 3♣ or 3♦. Bid 3♣ for now. Let partner in on the final contract.
0

#4 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,760
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2016-May-14, 12:07

Why didn't I bid 2NT over 2♣?
1

#5 User is offline   Tramticket 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,103
  • Joined: 2009-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent (Near London)

Posted 2016-May-14, 12:55

What is 2H? 4th suit forcing? The opening post doesn't alert.

If it is 4sf, I would bid 2NT. If it isn't 4sf, then our hand has suddenly grown in strength - but I don't know what continuations I can now bid, that are forcing?
0

#6 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2016-May-14, 13:35

 TylerE, on 2016-May-14, 12:07, said:

Why didn't I bid 2NT over 2♣?

Because you weren't strong enough.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#7 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,826
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2016-May-14, 17:05

I will try 3h having denied 4 cards in hearts I hope
0

#8 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2016-May-14, 22:01

Since 2♦ agreed ♦ (albeit a potential false preference), 2♥ is forward going. Let's do so slowly - 3♣ is the next control bid. We will not stop short of 5♦ and can consider 6♦ if partner happens to control bid a ♠ void. We have 2 keys to offer partner if they then choose minorwood/kickback.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
0

#9 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2016-May-14, 22:27

 Wayne_LV, on 2016-May-14, 11:23, said:

IMO partner has 0-2 ♠s, 0-3 ♥s, 5+ ♦s, 4+ ♣s, a good shapely hand. I rank
  • 3♥ = NAT or CUE. Showing ♥ stop and worry about 3N. Partner has already denied 4 ♥s.
  • 3N = MAX. With good ♥ stop.
  • 2N = NAT. With ♥ stop but partner might pass.
  • 3♣ = CUE.
  • 5♦ = NAT. With values in partner's suits but your 4333 shape may disappoint partner :(
  • 4♦ = NAT. Blame transfer.
  • 3♦ = NAT. Underbid.
  • 4♥ = SPL? Misdescriptive.
  • 3♠ = NAT. Masochistic.

Guthrie.tech
0

#10 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2016-May-15, 02:00

Can partner not be 1444?

ahydra
0

#11 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2016-May-15, 04:08

 Wayne_LV, on 2016-May-14, 11:23, said:




2♥ shows opener holds exact 17hcp , maybe with 4441,5440 and 5431 shapes, singleton or voidness in ♠, so responder needs to probe for potential slam slowly, 3♣ is a best choice in this point.
0

#12 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2016-May-15, 05:53

3♦. So I cannot reply to the poll.
0

#13 User is offline   PhilG007 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 973
  • Joined: 2013-February-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee Scotland United Kingdom
  • Interests:Occasional chess player. Dominoes

Posted 2016-May-15, 06:17

I would regard the 2♥ as 4th suit forcing asking for a ♥ stopper
As I have 3 honors in the suit I would chance 3NT and hope that the spade bid acts
as a lead deterrent. As there is a known 17 count opposite and I only have 9,
I wouldn't even be thinking of a slam.
"It is not enough to be a good player, you must also play well"
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster

Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)


"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
0

#14 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2016-May-15, 07:02

I've been away too long.

Why no votes for a 3♠ "Bluhmer" bid? This can't logically be natural, so can (and should) be used to show the nuts for our previous bidding and zero points in spades. Partner is implying spade shortage - maybe he has:

♠-
♥Axx
♦AQxxxx
♣KQJx

Job done.
3

#15 User is offline   notproven 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 2016-April-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NJ, USA

Posted 2016-May-15, 07:48

PhilKing has it exactly right. Not hard, if he reads the Bridge Bulletin like I do: this exact hand was in last months "It's Your Call" competition. The plurality of the super expert panel bid 3♠.
Lou Bluhm championed the bid to show a balanced hand, maximum for his first two (weak) calls, with nothing wasted in spades and all cards working. It is forcing to game in a minor, and leaves it to opener to decide if a minor suit slam is possible.
0

#16 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2016-May-15, 08:08

 notproven, on 2016-May-15, 07:48, said:

PhilKing has it exactly right. Not hard, if he reads the Bridge Bulletin like I do: this exact hand was in last months "It's Your Call" competition. The plurality of the super expert panel bid 3♠.Lou Bluhm championed the bid to show a balanced hand, maximum for his first two (weak) calls, with nothing wasted in spades and all cards working. It is forcing to game in a minor, and leaves it to opener to decide if a minor suit slam is possible.
Thank you both! Logical and clever. On a good day, you could deduce that meaning, at the table.
Guthrie.tech
0

#17 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2016-May-15, 08:18

 notproven, on 2016-May-15, 07:48, said:

PhilKing has it exactly right. Not hard, if he reads the Bridge Bulletin like I do: this exact hand was in last months "It's Your Call" competition. The plurality of the super expert panel bid 3♠.
Lou Bluhm championed the bid to show a balanced hand, maximum for his first two (weak) calls, with nothing wasted in spades and all cards working. It is forcing to game in a minor, and leaves it to opener to decide if a minor suit slam is possible.


Of the 994 respondents, only SIX chose 3♠.

I wonder who the other five were :P
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#18 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2016-May-15, 08:27

 PhilKing, on 2016-May-15, 07:02, said:

I've been away too long.

Why no votes for a 3♠ "Bluhmer" bid? This can't logically be natural, so can (and should) be used to show the nuts for our previous bidding and zero points in spades. Partner is implying spade shortage - maybe he has:

♠-
♥Axx
♦AQxxxx
♣KQJx

Job done.

I was going to mention Bluhmer but forgot to post! Welcome back anyway.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#19 User is offline   GrahamJson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 560
  • Joined: 2014-October-11

Posted 2016-May-15, 10:21

My first inclination was to bid 3C. But partner might get it into his head that I was trying to show heart shortage, or at least weakness. I want to show positive diamond support and good values, hence my final choice of 4D. 3S seems too much like a master bid to me and very likely to be misinterpreted, no matter what the logic might be.
0

#20 User is offline   Wayne_LV 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 180
  • Joined: 2003-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Henderson, NV
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker

Posted 2016-May-15, 10:23

 PhilKing, on 2016-May-15, 07:02, said:

I've been away too long.

Why no votes for a 3♠ "Bluhmer" bid? This can't logically be natural, so can (and should) be used to show the nuts for our previous bidding and zero points in spades. Partner is implying spade shortage - maybe he has:

♠-
♥Axx
♦AQxxxx
♣KQJx

Job done.


Well done. This hand was indeed in the Bridge Bulletin and 3♠ was the most popular choice of the expert panel.

The North hand


I realize the hand was contrived to showcase the Bluhmer bid, but as I tried to solve it I could never convince myself from the bidding and the south hand that there was even a sure game, let alone a slam and my choice was 3♥ showing a delayed 3 card raise in hearts and inviting to a heart game. For a slam to be possible I could not conceive of a North hand strong enough to make a slam that would not have opened 2♣


My regular partner and I would have bid the hand as follows per our partnership agreements:


0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users