BBO Discussion Forums: Lost Contract? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lost Contract?

#1 User is offline   jallerton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,796
  • Joined: 2008-September-12
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-May-13, 01:22

I have copies of three lawbooks. They are entitled:

"The Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge 1987"
"The Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge 1997"
"The Laws of Duplicate Bridge 2007"

Have we stopped playing Contract Bridge without realising it?
0

#2 User is offline   WellSpyder 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,627
  • Joined: 2009-November-30
  • Location:Oxfordshire, England

Posted 2015-May-13, 02:10

Or maybe we have stopped playing auction bridge and finally realised it.
0

#3 User is offline   pran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,344
  • Joined: 2009-September-14
  • Location:Ski, Norway

Posted 2015-May-13, 03:12

View Postjallerton, on 2015-May-13, 01:22, said:

I have copies of three lawbooks. They are entitled:

"The Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge 1987"
"The Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge 1997"
"The Laws of Duplicate Bridge 2007"

Have we stopped playing Contract Bridge without realising it?

There were four separate laws in the earlier thirties:
The Laws of Auction Bridge
The Laws of Contract Bridge
The Laws of Duplicate Bridge (applied to both Auction and Contract)
The Laws of Duplicate Whist

Three of them eventually lost interest and the Laws of Duplicate Bridge was reconfigured for Duplicate Contract Bridge only (and correspondingly renamed).

In 2007 WBFLC announced the renaming to The Laws of Duplicate Bridge.
0

#4 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2015-May-13, 03:31

View Postpran, on 2015-May-13, 03:12, said:

There were four separate laws in the earlier thirties:
The Laws of Auction Bridge
The Laws of Contract Bridge
The Laws of Duplicate Bridge (applied to both Auction and Contract)
The Laws of Duplicate Whist

Three of them eventually lost interest and the Laws of Duplicate Bridge was reconfigured for Duplicate Contract Bridge only (and correspondingly renamed).

In 2007 WBFLC announced the renaming to The Laws of Duplicate Bridge.

The Laws of Contract Bridge remained in the 1993 edition and in the 2014 "International Laws of Contract Bridge", although the ACBL version of the latter has been renamed the "Laws of Rubber Bridge".
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2015-May-13, 17:16

I think this is in the wrong forum. The name of the publication does not form part of the Laws, so this is not a change to a Law or Laws.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2015-May-13, 17:20

View Postgnasher, on 2015-May-13, 17:16, said:

I think this is in the wrong forum. The name of the publication does not form part of the Laws, so this is not a change to a Law or Laws.

Is this the forum for nitpicks, then?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
2
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users