BBO Discussion Forums: These bids need definition - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

These bids need definition

#1 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2015-April-28, 02:11



After double,I found there are no definition on these bids ( for example:2♦,3♦,4♦) .
Their explanations are same: biddable ♦.
0

#2 User is offline   cloa513 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,528
  • Joined: 2008-December-02

Posted 2015-April-28, 08:05

View Postlycier, on 2015-April-28, 02:11, said:



After double,I found there are no definition on these bids ( for example:2♦,3♦,4♦) .
Their explanations are same: biddable ♦.

What do you think they should be defined as?
0

#3 User is offline   lycier 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,612
  • Joined: 2009-September-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:China

Posted 2015-April-28, 10:16

View Postcloa513, on 2015-April-28, 08:05, said:

What do you think they should be defined as?


Thank you for your reply,now I have a try,only for reference .
After double :
1- 1♦=4-card ♦,weak hand with less then 8hcp
2- According to Gib CC,2♣=11+hcp
3- 2♦=4+♦ with 8-10hcp
4- 3♦=preemptive, 6-card♦ with less than 7hcp
5- 4♦=preemptive,7-card ♦,weakish hand with 0-5hcp
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users