Bidding problem teams match
#1
Posted 2015-February-18, 19:47
You open 1D, LHO bids 1S and partner bids 2H to you. What do you bid?
#2
Posted 2015-February-18, 20:01
#3
Posted 2015-February-18, 20:18
-- Bertrand Russell
#4
Posted 2015-February-18, 20:58
#5
Posted 2015-February-18, 21:06
over 2nt response will bid a forcing 3d
over 3h response will bid 4d.
#6
Posted 2015-February-18, 21:58
If not, I follow the pathway that allows me to bid a forcing 3D. I don't want to bid 3S here followed by 3D. Apart from anything else, shouldn't 3S be a splinter?
If I don't have a way to bid 3D forcing, I bid 3NT and tell partner I need a way to rebid my suit below 3NT and have it forcing.
#7
Posted 2015-February-19, 01:26
You have only 15 HCP, but have an excellent 7 card ♦ suit. It is a 5 loser hand which is a bit better playing strength than a lot of 16-18 point hands which you would jump rebid in ♦. There's no reason not to let that you have a strong hand.
#8
Posted 2015-February-19, 05:58
bob1509, on 2015-February-18, 20:58, said:
This is not a bidding problem so much as a system problem. These agreements are basically unworkable and will often lead to problems such as this.
#9
Posted 2015-February-19, 06:20
So 2s is just any hand that can't bid anything else and we can use 3s as the strong raise.
#10
Posted 2015-February-19, 07:00
With the OP's agreements I think I bid 3♣ intending to bid 3♠ over 3red assuming 2N is NF.
#11
Posted 2015-February-19, 07:40
#12
Posted 2015-February-19, 08:10
helene_t, on 2015-February-19, 07:40, said:
I have to hold my nose and bid 3♦, the advantages of this approach come when I don't have to do this, reverse the honours in spades and clubs and I might bid 3♣ not showing extras and limited by the failure to bid 2N.
Clearly you can only do this in a weak NT context, as otherwise what do you do with a 4243 12 count ?
#13
Posted 2015-February-19, 08:27
Playing strong NT I rebid a nonforcing 2NT with the weak balanced hand as well as with the balanced hand, and use 2♠ with the awkward strong hands (including those that would like to make a forcing 3♦ bid) but also with those that would like to make a nonforcing 3♣ bid. But maybe 2♠ should be reserved for strong hands so 3♣ is nonforcing? I am not even sure what is standard, help!
If 2NT is a generic strong hand, then presumably 2♠ is a generic weak hand?
#14
Posted 2015-February-19, 08:45
#15
Posted 2015-February-19, 08:53
London UK
#17
Posted 2015-February-19, 12:10
gordontd, on 2015-February-19, 08:53, said:
I was about to suggest 3NT myself and to say that partner is quite likely to have a spade card as there has been no raise. I am surprised that someone called Bob did not choose it!