BBO Discussion Forums: Nothing to say, North? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Nothing to say, North?

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-March-17, 14:57

Although it would probably lead to ugliness on this hand, I think North should be bidding something...

0

#2 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-March-17, 15:54

I respectfully disagree! Why should it step in r/w with a balanced hand to a suit headed by the Q and out?

Save the GIB reports for the truly bizarre things the program seems wont to do.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
0

#3 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,826
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-March-17, 18:31

2h if constructive but not forcing seems fine..Not sure If gib plays 2h as nf.
0

#4 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2014-March-25, 16:56

Actually here GIB bids 2♥ without simulation.

GIB plays here new suit constructive, but not truly forcing, could be passes without extras by partner. 5+ cards and supposedly 9-11TP.

But for particular hand, probably due vulnerability GIB found 2♥ as not reasonable in 30% of cases and passes like here.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users