Help
What now?
Would you have bid 1♥ or 2♥ the first time around?
Edit: In response to bd71, this was on BBO IMP scoring with unknown opponents.
What do you bid?
#1
- Lamentable Bunny
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,505
- Joined: 2008-March-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, ME
Posted 2011-August-31, 07:48
What now?
Would you have bid 1♥ or 2♥ the first time around?
Edit: In response to bd71, this was on BBO IMP scoring with unknown opponents.
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,153
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2011-August-31, 08:44
3♥ - 5 card suit, I'd have opened with 6 (yes I'd pass first time), probably vaguely at home in spades also.
#3
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 491
- Joined: 2009-September-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Suburban Philadelphia
Posted 2011-August-31, 09:27
I think knowing pairs or teams is important here.
Agree with 3♥, but I'm uncomfortable.
While I rarely open a weak 2 with 5, this might be the hand for it. I like to think that I definitely would have done it in teams so as to maximally obstruct any possible vulnerable game they have.
Agree with 3♥, but I'm uncomfortable.
While I rarely open a weak 2 with 5, this might be the hand for it. I like to think that I definitely would have done it in teams so as to maximally obstruct any possible vulnerable game they have.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,952
- Joined: 2008-June-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-August-31, 09:38
bd71, on 2011-August-31, 09:27, said:
I think knowing pairs or teams is important here.
Agree with 3♥, but I'm uncomfortable.
While I rarely open a weak 2 with 5, this might be the hand for it. I like to think that I definitely would have done it in teams so as to maximally obstruct any possible vulnerable game they have.
Agree with 3♥, but I'm uncomfortable.
While I rarely open a weak 2 with 5, this might be the hand for it. I like to think that I definitely would have done it in teams so as to maximally obstruct any possible vulnerable game they have.
All of the above, especially the uncomfortable part.
We are risking a 5-2 ♥ fit instead of a ?-3 ♠ fit in all circumstances but pard should probably play us for a ♠ tolerance. My next headache is if pard bids 3♠ over 3♥.
I can give several reasons to open weak 2's on 5-card suits but given my track record on doing it you should do the opposite.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#5
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-August-31, 12:20
3S, I have a fit and not enough to bid game, keep it simple.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#6
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-August-31, 12:21
bd71, on 2011-August-31, 09:27, said:
I think knowing pairs or teams is important here.
Agree with 3♥, but I'm uncomfortable.
While I rarely open a weak 2 with 5, this might be the hand for it. I like to think that I definitely would have done it in teams so as to maximally obstruct any possible vulnerable game they have.
Agree with 3♥, but I'm uncomfortable.
While I rarely open a weak 2 with 5, this might be the hand for it. I like to think that I definitely would have done it in teams so as to maximally obstruct any possible vulnerable game they have.
5332 is not the hand for it. Neither is second seat.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,465
- Joined: 2006-January-07
- Location:Montreal Canada
- Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.
Posted 2011-August-31, 12:45
For me this is near perfect for a 3H PHJSF. I dont believe in the standard requirement of 4 trumps.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#8
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
#9
- Lamentable Bunny
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,505
- Joined: 2008-March-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, ME
Posted 2011-August-31, 13:32
PHJSF?
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#10
- Redoubling with gusto
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,712
- Joined: 2009-October-19
- Gender:Male
- Location:Las Vegas, NV
- Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.
Posted 2011-August-31, 13:36
PHNJSF?
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,568
- Joined: 2006-June-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Barrington IL USA
- Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey
Posted 2011-August-31, 13:40
JLOGIC, on 2011-August-31, 12:20, said:
3S, I have a fit and not enough to bid game, keep it simple.
Agreed. If we belong in 4♠ PD can carry on. It may look like we have quite alot for just bidding 3♠ but we have 3 small trumps and likely 2♦ losers since they are often 6-3-2-2 on this bidding.
I agree with the initial pass.
#12
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 375
- Joined: 2011-April-12
Posted 2011-August-31, 14:36
I wouldn't have opened the hand.
I'll bid 4♠ now. I assume partner has more than just an opening hand to overcall. Something like:
♠AKQxx
♥xx
♦xx
♣AQxx
Lose 2 diamonds and probably a club.
Of course if partner has ♦A then you can probably pitch diamonds on the good hearts.
My answer would be different if I expected my partner to overcall any preempt on a bare minimum opener.
I'll bid 4♠ now. I assume partner has more than just an opening hand to overcall. Something like:
♠AKQxx
♥xx
♦xx
♣AQxx
Lose 2 diamonds and probably a club.
Of course if partner has ♦A then you can probably pitch diamonds on the good hearts.
My answer would be different if I expected my partner to overcall any preempt on a bare minimum opener.
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2011-August-31, 14:46
BunnyGo, on 2011-August-31, 07:48, said:
What now?
Would you have bid 1♥ or 2♥ the first time around?
Would you have bid 1♥ or 2♥ the first time around?
Now 3H. Being a passed hand, this tends to show some spade tolerance.
I'm ok with 2H before. But find the hand a tad too weakish in defense for a 1H opener.
#14
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,000
- Joined: 2005-June-15
- Gender:Male
- Location:Canada
- Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.
Posted 2011-August-31, 14:48
I agree with all of Justin's posts on this thread, perhaps most of all with the 'sigh'.
For those who claim 3♥ has to show spades, that is true only if there are never any hands with long hearts with which you wouldn't open and may now want to bid hearts naturally. I know there are players who think like that....but I don't think it is standard.
For those who claim 3♥ has to show spades, that is true only if there are never any hands with long hearts with which you wouldn't open and may now want to bid hearts naturally. I know there are players who think like that....but I don't think it is standard.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,092
- Joined: 2008-December-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:North Texas, USA
- Interests:Mountain Biking
Posted 2011-August-31, 14:59
JDonn is spinning in his cubicle over the thought of 3♥ being a FSNJS.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#16
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2011-August-31, 15:31
where is he, the donner man?
#17
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
Posted 2011-August-31, 15:37
whereagles, on 2011-August-31, 15:31, said:
where is he, the donner man?
He was able to quit cold turkey when the forums software changed. More power to him, I find it impossible though lol.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#18
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2011-August-31, 15:47
I would bid 3♥ now. That shows ♠ fit or at least tolerance for me.
I am asking myself "Should i spare this 3♥ bid by passed hand for the hands that somehow did not open 1 or 2 ♥ at these colors, has no ♠ fit or tolerance but can bid at 3 level and cross his fingers for nothing bad to happen, or should i spare it for fit showing bid, which by the way can be used in wide purpose and can be made with just 4 or even 3 card concentrated suits such as AQJx AKJ in case in opponents may decide to put some more pressure on us and too good to just bid 3♠ and has no space to cue etc etc.
Of course a persistent poster can construct hands where the passed hand has no fit or tolerance but must bid at 3 level a new suit. But i will pay off for those hands if these hands somehow are not passable or can not be shown by a DBL. A simple 3♠ bid can be made with a wide variety of hands. Points can be anywhere or a little bit of everywhere. Pd is also under pressure and we are already at 3 level with no game trial space available, Why would i give up on my ability to give a better picture of my hand to partner for the sake of sparing it to the hands which had the chance before but didnt, and now wants to bid at 3 level and cant even pass or DBL.
I am asking myself "Should i spare this 3♥ bid by passed hand for the hands that somehow did not open 1 or 2 ♥ at these colors, has no ♠ fit or tolerance but can bid at 3 level and cross his fingers for nothing bad to happen, or should i spare it for fit showing bid, which by the way can be used in wide purpose and can be made with just 4 or even 3 card concentrated suits such as AQJx AKJ in case in opponents may decide to put some more pressure on us and too good to just bid 3♠ and has no space to cue etc etc.
Of course a persistent poster can construct hands where the passed hand has no fit or tolerance but must bid at 3 level a new suit. But i will pay off for those hands if these hands somehow are not passable or can not be shown by a DBL. A simple 3♠ bid can be made with a wide variety of hands. Points can be anywhere or a little bit of everywhere. Pd is also under pressure and we are already at 3 level with no game trial space available, Why would i give up on my ability to give a better picture of my hand to partner for the sake of sparing it to the hands which had the chance before but didnt, and now wants to bid at 3 level and cant even pass or DBL.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#19
- Lamentable Bunny
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,505
- Joined: 2008-March-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portland, ME
Posted 2011-September-01, 02:52
Based on the principle of "if you know what trumps are going to be, let your partner know too" I decided to bid 3 or 4 spades. Because I had a good 5 card side suit, I decided to just bid 4. Seems from the posters above that this is a tad on the aggressive side. Here's the whole hand.
Who knew it was partner with the short diamonds and me with the short clubs?
Who knew it was partner with the short diamonds and me with the short clubs?
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#20
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2011-September-02, 07:54
JLOGIC, on 2011-August-31, 15:37, said:
He was able to quit cold turkey when the forums software changed. More power to him, I find it impossible though lol.
Get him back here. We liked his underbidding stubburness ahah