Help
{comments}
Double was negative.
No peeking.
Page 1 of 1
Since we're talking and simming leads vs 3NT I think this one was interesting
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,082
- Joined: 2006-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santiago, Chile
- Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.
Posted 2011-June-17, 18:26
MSC, June, 1999:
Double was negative.
No peeking.
Double was negative.
No peeking.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#2
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2011-June-17, 20:39
(Assuming pd has a stopper they need to knock) I lead a ♥, leading small seems like creating problems when pd has Qxxxx or QTxxx even when he has ATxxx declarer's Qxxx will be problem, i will lead K of ♥.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#3
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 815
- Joined: 2009-August-31
Posted 2011-June-17, 21:39
I've begun leading the J from this holding and think its 100% correct.
Aaron Jones Unit 557
www.longbeachbridge.com
www.longbeachbridge.com
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,211
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2011-June-18, 03:15
rduran1216, on 2011-June-17, 21:39, said:
I've begun leading the J from this holding and think its 100% correct.
J only goes badly wrong vs Q/1098x in the 2 hands when compared to K, possible but not likely. It's not good in the x/Q109x scenario, but K may not be much better.
But does it ever gain where dummy is known to be short ? Only if declarer has Qxx and partner A109... (or A98xxx with stiff 10 on deck) and not sure I'd be bidding 3N with hearts bid and raised with that.
J is clear if the long hearts are known to be on your left or unknown, but with them on your right, I'm not so sure.
#5
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2011-June-18, 05:12
Cyberyeti, on 2011-June-18, 03:15, said:
But does it ever gain where dummy is known to be short ? Only if declarer has Qxx and partner A109... (or A98xxx with stiff 10 on deck) and not sure I'd be bidding 3N with hearts bid and raised with that.
Even with those J doesn't work better than small lead.
But i am not even sure if we shd lead a ♥ now. The more i think the more options are available. Kof ♥ works mainly when declarer has Qxxx and cant cash 9 tricks without knocking down pd's ♣ honor or something. On the other hand leading a ♥ may give him the 9th trick while a passive lead would hold him to 8 tricks. (suppose pd has ♠ A instead of ♣ stopper and declarer scored 6♣+2♦+1♥ with QTx ♥)
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,555
- Joined: 2007-January-22
Posted 2011-June-18, 07:31
Too difficult for simulation because it's not clear how to define opponents hands.
I would lead Q♦
I would lead Q♦
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,211
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2011-June-19, 06:33
MrAce, on 2011-June-18, 05:12, said:
Even with those J doesn't work better than small lead.
Actually it does in a strange way, if you lead a small one, you will win the second and third rounds. If you lead the J, declarer has the losing option of playing you for J10x when partner wins the A and returns the 9 in the x/Qxx scenario.
Page 1 of 1