BBO Discussion Forums: offsuit signal - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

offsuit signal

Poll: offsuit signal (36 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you use offsuit signals

  1. Yes (2 votes [5.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.56%

  2. No (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. What the heck are offsuit signals (34 votes [94.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 94.44%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2011-January-22, 12:01

Last night, I cleverly used an offsuit signal to help partner out. Partner didn't pick up on it, and when I asked about it after the session, he said "what the heck is are offsuit signals". I don't remember seeing it discussed in the forum so I wonder, how many people play them, and since my partner was rather experienced and never heard of them, I wonder how common they are?

An answer of "NO" means you know what they are, but do not play them.
--Ben--

#2 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-22, 12:16

View Postinquiry, on 2011-January-22, 12:01, said:

Last night, I cleverly used an offsuit signal to help partner out. Partner didn't pick up on it, and when I asked about it after the session, he said "what the heck is are offsuit signals". I don't remember seeing it discussed in the forum so I wonder, how many people play them, and since my partner was rather experienced and never heard of them, I wonder how common they are?

An answer of "NO" means you know what they are, but do not play them.


My guess is that it's probably a method to signal parity in another suit by discarding, but an education will be greatly appreciated...
foobar on BBO
0

#3 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2011-January-22, 12:39

I wouldn't be surprised if I've heard of them or even experimented with them under another name -- but never heard the term before.
0

#4 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-January-22, 12:57

Never heard of 'em
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#5 User is offline   Tomi2 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 241
  • Joined: 2005-November-07

Posted 2011-January-22, 14:08

my father once lead the 2 of hearts in the second trick, and later when I misdefended, because I did not know the count in clubs he told me, that he needed to play a heart but the small card he played was a count signal in clubs. I did not find tat out at the table, but I think it was a very good idea...

is that such a signal?
0

#6 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-January-22, 14:13

Is it similar to an off colour joke?
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#7 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2011-January-22, 15:16

Ok, at the time I am preparing this reply the vote is 9 = "what the heck" and none on yes or no's. So I guess this is a signal not used because forum members are quite knowledgeable as a group.

Offsuit signals was written up the Bridge World in the late 70's to early 90's. I don't remember the author, but it was one of those one or two page new idea kind of things they publish. The concept was that if dummy was pretty much unreachable, except in one suit, and your partner would NEED to know your count in that suit before the suit is lead, you signal "count" in that suit in other suit. It can be normal or UDC depending upon what you normally play. This is "partner needs to know" kind of signal. There were several restrictions on when you can use if. Obviously if you had to try to win an earlier trick, you can not signal (I can think of exceptions where you might try from a sequence but that is hard to read). I will thumb through the old bridge worlds later and see if I can find the article, but here is the hand from last night.... I will show dummy and my hand....

Opening lead was the CLUB 9 (second best leads, so partner has one of A K Q or J since we hold the TEN)


What does partner need to know, and how are you going to tell him.

This is where offsuit signals are used... they are RARE but when you need them, you need them.
--Ben--

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2011-January-22, 15:28

Many years ago, I wrote up a thesis for myself, where I decided to male signals cater to what is needed rather than what a prior agreement said. One of the three basic signals (count attitude or suit preference) was shown at the critical point for the critical suit at that point, with whatever suit you happened to be playing.

This specific situation (show count in the critical suit by using whatever suit you are playing to show that count) was one of the examples. Another example was, for instance, what is effectively a Lavinthal discard of sorts, meaning showing suit preference between X and Y with whatever cards you happen to play, even if in suit Z. Smith Echo is another example.

I sent a write-up to the Bridge World, and they thought it was too difficult for the average partnership to handle. So, it died. I am pleased to see that one of these ideas was not all that new after all. I am also convinced that a more expansive defense theory, from which the "off suit signal" would be but one example (with situation-specific Smith and situation-specific Lavinthal and the like) of an approach that probably could be mastered by a really good partnership. The trick is to have both players capable of knowing what the critical question is, know when the critical question has arisen, and know that partner is on the same page. so, it should in theory work with two world-class defenders.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2011-January-22, 15:54

Found it.. It was in March 1988 Bridge World. I messed up it's name, the article was entitled "Side-suit signals" and was by Jeferry Sapire.

This was the full hand. I played the Ten (standard signals) Declarer won the KING and lead the Jack. My partner ducked, and that was that. My club ten was suppose to show even count in diamonds..... :(






--Ben--

#10 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-22, 15:58

Yes a signal would have helped but your partners play is horrible. He played declarer to have driven to slam with not only Jx of diamonds but also another side suit loser.
0

#11 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-January-22, 16:29

I've discussed a similar idea before our idea was to use pips in trump to signal count in a 'side suit'. I think its difficult to try to craft a signal around when 3rd hand is just 'playing bridge', which could well be the case if we held Qxx, although I agree it would be a good time to have this agreement.

I'm missing several years of the BW. Since I was married in March, '88, its not surprising I don't have this issue :)

Agree with Justin that your partner missed a baby inference.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#12 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2011-January-22, 17:26

View PostJLOGIC, on 2011-January-22, 15:58, said:

Yes a signal would have helped but your partners play is horrible. He played declarer to have driven to slam with not only Jx of diamonds but also another side suit loser.


I said he was rather experienced, I didn't say he was any good. He knows a lot of theory and terms, he not that good of a player. It was his not hearing about it and my realization that I haven't seen it here in the forum that lead me to ask about it. I actually thought he would know it, but that he would take the club ten as please continue them.
--Ben--

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-January-23, 16:49

I heard something about "prisma signals". Anyone got a link to that?
0

#14 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2011-January-23, 16:59

Prism signals are totally different than what Ben is discussing.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#15 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2011-January-23, 17:47

http://prismsignals.com/PDFonline.pdf
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#16 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2011-January-23, 18:35

View Postgwnn, on 2011-January-23, 17:47, said:


Would never play them, I'm very simplistic on defensive signalling, but was a fun (and very interesting) read... Thanks.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#17 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2011-January-24, 04:57

It would almost surely improve my defence since I'm sloppy with tracing all four suits, but I'm too lazy and not persuasive enough to convince anyone to play them. and I haven't played bridge in a while :)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#18 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-January-24, 07:55

View PostPhil, on 2011-January-23, 16:59, said:

Prism signals are totally different than what Ben is discussing.


yeah I know. I was just too lazy to open a new topic :) (sorry ben)

and, thx gwnn
0

#19 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2011-January-24, 08:06

hmmm... refraction, prisms, parity. Sounds like physics. Shd be fun :)
0

#20 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2011-January-24, 12:31

If we ever form a partnership, we'll adopt prism signals and rule the world.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users