1NT:2NT Puppet
#1
Posted 2010-November-18, 00:01
Thanks
#3
Posted 2010-November-18, 05:42
downagain, on 2010-November-18, 00:12, said:
3♥ = 4♠
3♠ = 4♥
3N = To Play
side issue request:
How did you get the proper "spacing" in your post?
Wait... I see something now in the "copy" of your reply :
[indent]..... in front of 3♦
... but I don't know how that [indent] function works ??
Edit: I now see [indent] ... and ... [ /indent ] right behind "to play" .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#4
Posted 2010-November-18, 05:55
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2010-November-18, 05:42, said:
How did you get the proper "spacing" in your post?
Wait... I see something now in the "copy" of your reply :
[indent]..... in front of 3♦
... but I don't know how that [indent] function works ??
When you are writing a post, there is a sneaky little button with a question mark in a blue circle, in the same row as the "other styles" and "fonts" drop-downs.
-- Bertrand Russell
#5
Posted 2010-November-18, 05:56
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2010-November-18, 05:42, said:
How did you get the proper "spacing" in your post?
Wait... I see something now in the "copy" of your reply :
[indent]..... in front of 3♦
... but I don't know how that [indent] function works ??
You should see the indent buttons at the right when you are writing a post: and (next to the indent buttons, you have the allign buttons)
#6
Posted 2010-November-18, 06:11
downagain, on 2010-November-18, 00:12, said:
3♥ = 4♠
3♠ = 4♥
3N = To Play
I think I see how to "indent" now.
But another issue: I wasn't able to use this "indent" function to work when I tried to EDIT my previous post.
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#7
Posted 2010-November-18, 06:41
I assume 4-4 majors goes through 2C Stayman so opener doesn't have to disclose whether he has four hearts or not when you go through puppet? What is 1N:2C, 2M:3N?
#8
Posted 2010-November-18, 06:56
MickyB, on 2010-November-18, 06:41, said:
Yes, they use stayman with 4-4 majors.
I have seen them using both 2♣ and 2N with only 1 major. Maybe they use 2N with 4-3 majors.. to find a possible 5-3 fit.. but I haven't verified that.
1N-2♣ // 2M-3N shows 4OM. (but if the previous assumption is correct..it also shows 0-2M.. or not interested in finding a 5-3 fit)
#9
Posted 2010-November-18, 08:50
downagain, on 2010-November-18, 00:12, said:
3♥ = 4♠
3♠ = 4♥
3N = To Play
I've seen this, too, and I thought I must be missing 1N-2N, 3D. Do they really not use that?
I use Puppet Stayman, too, but 1N-2N, 3D shows an unspecified 4333 (a la Klinger) but this isn't really necessary because responder can show a 4-cd major over a 3C rebid and then retreat to
3N with a 4333.
I'd like a way for responder to show interest in a 5-3 major suit fit without opener having to show a 5-cd major but haven't figured out a way to do that starting with 2N.
#10
Posted 2010-November-18, 08:52
mgoetze, on 2010-November-18, 05:55, said:
Ty, mg
And ty too, downagain
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#11
Posted 2010-November-20, 06:29
1NT-2NT;
If you play 3♣ as 5cm there you could play 4♣ after 3NT as Minor Suit Ask:
1NT-2NT; 3NT-4♣;
4♥ 3244
4♠ 2344
Though admittedly it might give away too much information and a minor fit finding system after Meckwell's 3♣ might work better. I personally play 3M as a singleton M, 3coM and (54) minor, which I guess is inferior but pretty simple to remember What do you think?
Dutch U20
#12
Posted 2010-November-20, 07:17
#13
Posted 2010-November-20, 09:45
#14
Posted 2010-November-22, 07:03
Compare the auctions:
Regular PS: 1NT-3♣-3♦-3♥-3NT
Meckwell PS: 1NT-2NT-3♣-3♥-3NT
In the first auction opps know about a 4 card ♥ in opener's hand, in the 2nd auction they know nothing.
#15
Posted 2020-May-06, 12:48
MickyB, on 2010-November-18, 00:01, said:
Thanks
Bringing life to this old conversation. I am interested if anybody have some thoughts on what NT structure fits, if you want to use 1nt-2nt as puppet.
My initial thoughts has been (Just copying some existing treatments).
1nt-2♣
2♦/♥-2♠=5 card spade. Invite.
1nt-2♦
2♥-2♠=Forcing 1 round. Invitational 5 card ♥
Normal transfers after 2♦ and 2♥=Normal transfers (But with game forcing transfer for responders second bid: 1nt-2♦;2♥-2nt=Hearts and clubs. gameforcing)
1nt-2♠=Range ask or clubs (Weak or gameforcing). Responder shows short suits
1nt-2nt=Puppet ala this tread.
1nt-3♣=Diamonds. Weak or gameforcing
1nt-3♦=? One option is 4-1 in majors and 4-4 in minors (3♥ from opener asks where the short suit is)
1nt-3♥=5-5 game invitational
........Sidenote:
.......1nt-2♥
.......2♠-3♦=5-5 majors, gameforcing(I like this sequence since it leaves room for opener to bid 3nt with no/poor fit .......for majors (2-2 in majors), or responder to show a void:
.......1nt-2♥
.......2♠-3♦
.......3♥(Sets hearts)-4♣/4♦=5-5 majors, void in suit bid)
1nt-3♠=5-5 minors, gameforcing.
There are some holes in my system:
If responder have 4 spades and 5 hearts with invitational strength there is no bid to show that, so i have to improvise and choose the smalles lie (Use garbage stayman)
Invitational hands with clubs or diamonds.
+Probably quite a few others
#16
Posted 2020-May-07, 06:20
- I play 1N - 2♣ - 2♦ - 2♥ as 5♥4♠ invitational. If you're 5-4 majors, transfer and pass
#17
Posted 2020-May-07, 09:02
The Pud, on 2020-May-07, 06:20, said:
- I play 1N - 2♣ - 2♦ - 2♥ as 5♥4♠ invitational. If you're 5-4 majors, transfer and pass
Ok. Yes, then you dont have a problem. But I usually uses this sequence as weak with play:
1N - 2♣
2♦ - 2♥ as 4♥+4♠ and weak (Opener passes or bids 2♠).
According to Wikipedia I gave the wrong explanation of what i play(According to Wikipedia my version is called crawling stayman).I think most of my partners would not be willing to give up 2♥ in this sequence as weak.