Climate change a different take on what to do about it.
#2701
Posted 2015-December-14, 21:15
At any rate, I am feeling quite good about it. If I'll cry tomorrow, well, it has happened before.
#2702
Posted 2015-December-15, 09:00
I guess what makes you feel good should be taxed but do we really need the junkets and bureaucracy?
#2703
Posted 2015-December-15, 17:51
Al_U_Card, on 2015-December-15, 09:00, said:
I guess what makes you feel good should be taxed but do we really need the junkets and bureaucracy?
Junkets. Hmm. Maybe I should see if they can use a mathematician. Have Theorem, will travel.
i recall that the Fields Medalist Steve Smale reportedly said, "I proved my best theorems on the beaches at Rio".
Oops. i should be serious.
#2704
Posted 2015-December-16, 07:20
kenberg, on 2015-December-15, 17:51, said:
i recall that the Fields Medalist Steve Smale reportedly said, "I proved my best theorems on the beaches at Rio".
Oops. i should be serious.
Wait what, you weren't being serious?
-gwnn
#2705
Posted 2015-December-16, 09:25
I think the New York Times editorial staff's take on the Paris accord is about right. I also think prospects for passing a revenue neutral carbon pricing bill in Congress have improved. Won't happen in this Congress and probably not even in the next Congress. Even if it happens by 2022, that's probably about 40 years too late. Pathetic? Yes. But not as pathetic as 50 or 60 years too late which is where we were headed before Paris. Here's looking at you kids.
#2706
Posted 2015-December-16, 10:36
y66, on 2015-December-16, 09:25, said:
I think the New York Times editorial staff's take on the Paris accord is about right. I also think prospects for passing a revenue neutral carbon pricing bill in Congress have improved. Won't happen in this Congress and probably not even in the next Congress. Even if it happens by 2022, that's probably about 40 years too late. Pathetic? Yes. But not as pathetic as 50 or 60 years too late which is where we were headed before Paris. Here's looking at you kids.
Any serious carbon policy is unlikely until the economics of alternate energy production improves relative to carbon-based fuels. The idea that any action is too late is pessimistic, bordering on apocalyptic. Everything that has occurred thus far is reversible. At current trends, 2C will not be reached this century. Although 2C is a rather arbitrary limit.
#2707
Posted 2015-December-16, 11:15
#2708
Posted 2015-December-16, 23:17
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#2709
Posted 2015-December-17, 08:29
kenberg, on 2015-December-15, 17:51, said:
i recall that the Fields Medalist Steve Smale reportedly said, "I proved my best theorems on the beaches at Rio".
Oops. i should be serious.
You could always hope for THIS (The link describes how one delegate "spent" her downtime at CoP Paris.)
"Naturally, the Australian Conservation Foundation “stands for ecological sustainability. We get to the heart of environmental problems by tackling the underlying social and economic causes. We work across society to influence urgent, transformative action to deliver lasting change on the scale required to secure a sustainable environment.” And they use your money to do so – along with cash from volunteers, who must be delighted at how much of it has been converted to Moët."
#2710
Posted 2015-December-17, 12:01
#2711
Posted 2015-December-17, 12:26
mike777, on 2015-December-17, 12:01, said:
Miami Beach is not already underwater. The area floods frequently, due to the high tides and low elevation. Miami Beach has over 90,000 residents, a 5% increase since 2010. If it were underwater already, I suspect many would have moved out by now, and the population would be decreasing.
#2712
Posted 2015-December-17, 13:18
Daniel1960, on 2015-December-17, 12:26, said:
Well, high tide for today in Miami Beach was at 12:28 PM, so odds are it was flooded when Mike was writing...
#2713
Posted 2015-December-17, 13:27
hrothgar, on 2015-December-17, 13:18, said:
Unlikely. The article was referring to unusually high tides, like the super blood moon or lunar eclipses. Miami Beach does not currently flood at high tide.
#2714
Posted 2015-December-17, 13:59
However Kenneth Griffen a very famous hedge fund, recently divorced guy from Chicago just bought the highest price home in Dade County...Miami Beach for 60Million...ten million more than the asking price. It is a penthouse, high off the ground. So yes some people are still buying homes there.
#2715
Posted 2015-December-18, 06:39
mike777, on 2015-December-17, 13:59, said:
However Kenneth Griffen a very famous hedge fund, recently divorced guy from Chicago just bought the highest price home in Dade County...Miami Beach for 60Million...ten million more than the asking price. It is a penthouse, high off the ground. So yes some people are still buying homes there.
Yes, I usually read these stories with a grain of salt. IF the situation was truly dire, then the people would be leaving in droves. A similar situation is occurring among the Pacific islands. Claims of rapidly sinking islands do not coincide with mass emigration. Thus far, it is still status quo.
#2716
Posted 2015-December-18, 08:46
y66, on 2015-December-16, 09:25, said:
Congress and revenue neutral .. like oil and water?
-gwnn
#2717
Posted 2015-December-18, 09:45
Daniel1960, on 2015-December-18, 06:39, said:
Here's an alternative explanation
1. The inhabitants don't have enough money to move
2. There is no place out there willing to take them
I'm sure that once the situation gets dire enough, those Australian concentration camps might start looking good...
However, this isn't much of a signal
#2718
Posted 2015-December-18, 10:15
Daniel1960, on 2015-December-18, 06:39, said:
The following might explain why the Maldives (of scuba-government fame) have opted for a new airport runway and luxury condos...
From New Scientist: Kiribati and other coral atolls grow as seas rise...
#2719
Posted 2015-December-18, 11:19
Al_U_Card, on 2015-December-17, 08:29, said:
"Naturally, the Australian Conservation Foundation "stands for ecological sustainability. We get to the heart of environmental problems by tackling the underlying social and economic causes. We work across society to influence urgent, transformative action to deliver lasting change on the scale required to secure a sustainable environment." And they use your money to do so – along with cash from volunteers, who must be delighted at how much of it has been converted to Moët."
A gal's gotta eat, what can I say. More seriously, if a person puts n a good day's work then what s/he does in the evening is his/her own business. There is of course a legitimate question of who is picking up the tab. A while back I went to a conference inn Portland OR. I also spent some very enjoyable time on the Pacific coast.I picked up the cost of my time on the coast, the school picked up the cost of my time at the conference. An honest arrangement I think. No Duck Le Orange in either case, unfortunately.
#2720
Posted 2015-December-18, 11:55
billw55, on 2015-December-18, 08:46, said:
It may require some emulsification. There is a precedent.
According to wikipedia, the word "emulsion" comes from the Latin word for "to milk".