Handling 6-5 hands
#1
Posted 2010-June-28, 13:04
How do you open the hand and what is the rebid plan? If it depends on the strength of the hand, what is the minimum hand on which you open in the lower suit?
#2
Posted 2010-June-28, 13:18
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2010-June-28, 14:46
#4
Posted 2010-June-28, 14:53
George Carlin
#5
Posted 2010-June-28, 15:06
#6
Posted 2010-June-28, 16:58
#7
Posted 2010-June-28, 17:01
#8
Posted 2010-June-28, 17:46
as:
1. You know there is a club fit
2. If you are strong enough that there might be still a game you can still reverse
3. As Helene pointed out the auction wont occur very frequently
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#9
Posted 2010-June-28, 21:37
The_Hog, on Jun 28 2010, 06:01 PM, said:
My absolute minimum for a reverse is a superb 12 count with all the points in the two suits.. ie AQT9x,void,xx,AQT9xx has more than adequate playing strength for me, and I'd likely do the same if 1-1 in red suits.
Anyhow.. I agree with Wayne that you're fine if you open 1♣ and pard responds 1NT since some ♣ support is certain.
.. neilkaz ..
#10
Posted 2010-June-29, 01:56
neilkaz, on Jun 29 2010, 10:37 AM, said:
The_Hog, on Jun 28 2010, 06:01 PM, said:
My absolute minimum for a reverse is a superb 12 count with all the points in the two suits.. ie AQT9x,void,xx,AQT9xx has more than adequate playing strength for me, and I'd likely do the same if 1-1 in red suits.
Anyhow.. I agree with Wayne that you're fine if you open 1♣ and pard responds 1NT since some ♣ support is certain.
.. neilkaz ..
Neil, the problem is not with the playing strength, that is fine. The problem occurs when partner thinks you have the values for a reverse which you promised and doubles a high level opponents contract. Or will you double cross her and pull her penalty doubles?
#11
Posted 2010-June-29, 02:03
The_Hog, on Jun 29 2010, 08:56 AM, said:
If it's your partnership style to reverse on a 5-6 12-count, and you reverse then show a 5-6, why would partner play you for normal reversing values?
#12
Posted 2010-June-29, 02:08
gnasher, on Jun 29 2010, 03:03 AM, said:
The_Hog, on Jun 29 2010, 08:56 AM, said:
If it's your partnership style to reverse on a 5-6 12-count, and you reverse then show a 5-6, why would partner play you for normal reversing values?
My question was going to be, if I open, partner responds, and I reverse, what makes us think the opponents are about to bid a high level contract?
I think the real problem with reversing on 5-6 12 counts is you make the range of the reverse very wide. It helps of course that partner knows you could have such a hand but it doesn't change the fact that your range is now something like 12 to 21 which is quite wide as the auction is rising. The playing strength won't always help if you don't find a fit. Or say partner bids 3 of your first suit and you then bid 3 of your second suit. Your range is still nearly as wide!
#13
Posted 2010-June-29, 02:51
jdonn, on Jun 29 2010, 03:08 AM, said:
Yes indeed, strange thought.
#14
Posted 2010-June-29, 03:42
The_Hog, on Jun 28 2010, 11:01 PM, said:
Agree, except that I for me a max is not hcp-based but loser-count based, i.e.
Axxxx
AKQxxx
x
x
(4 losers) is strong enough to me, whereas to the_hog it might not be
#15
Posted 2010-June-29, 04:32
#16
Posted 2010-June-29, 04:51
hanp, on Jun 29 2010, 09:51 AM, said:
jdonn, on Jun 29 2010, 03:08 AM, said:
Yes indeed, strange thought.
Nobody said that they've passed throighout whilst I've been bidding out my 6-5. I expect that the Hog was thinking of a sequence like this:
1♣ 1♠ 1NT 2♠
3♥ 4♠ dbl pass
#17
Posted 2010-June-29, 05:13
gnasher, on Jun 29 2010, 05:51 AM, said:
hanp, on Jun 29 2010, 09:51 AM, said:
jdonn, on Jun 29 2010, 03:08 AM, said:
Yes indeed, strange thought.
Nobody said that they've passed throighout whilst I've been bidding out my 6-5. I expect that the Hog was thinking of a sequence like this:
1♣ 1♠ 1NT 2♠
3♥ 4♠ dbl pass
A worthy try, but surely a 1435 17 count would double here. 3♥ sounds very likely to be 5-6, and it would be a naive partner who doubled 4♠ on the grounds that partner has shown 17HCP.
I agree with han and josh. Anyway, distorting our shape every time we hold a 5-6 in case one day there is a competitive auction where partner doubles the opponents in the belief we hold a strong hand shows a mistaken set of priorities.
#18
Posted 2010-June-29, 06:59
The_Hog, on Jun 29 2010, 02:56 AM, said:
neilkaz, on Jun 29 2010, 10:37 AM, said:
The_Hog, on Jun 28 2010, 06:01 PM, said:
My absolute minimum for a reverse is a superb 12 count with all the points in the two suits.. ie AQT9x,void,xx,AQT9xx has more than adequate playing strength for me, and I'd likely do the same if 1-1 in red suits.
Anyhow.. I agree with Wayne that you're fine if you open 1♣ and pard responds 1NT since some ♣ support is certain.
.. neilkaz ..
Neil, the problem is not with the playing strength, that is fine. The problem occurs when partner thinks you have the values for a reverse which you promised and doubles a high level opponents contract. Or will you double cross her and pull her penalty doubles?
I probably pull fewer penalty doubles than most players so let me consider how I feel when I've reversed on the given distribution and the partner doubles the opp's high level contract.
Well...I don't feel bad at all since I have two aces that I can expect to score on defence. I'd certainly feel better if I had kings with those aces instead of queens, but lets consider what has to occur for the opps to bid to a high level contract and for partner to double it.
Most likely for that to occur, the opps also have great distribution so what is partner doubling on? Likely a good holding in their trump suit and/or ace(s) of her own.
When both sides have great distribution neither partner nor I can expect to cash more than 1 trick (if that) in a side suit on defence anyhow if the opps have bid to a high level contract (assuming that they are sober).
.. neilkaz ..
#19
Posted 2010-June-29, 08:48
Personally with:
♠ + ♣ I will always open 1♣ unless the suit quality tells me not to.
♠ + ♦ or ♥ + ♣ I will usually open the minor, but I have had good results opening the major in 3rd seat if slam looks doubtful.
With the other combos, I might open the higher ranking suit a bit more often.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#20
Posted 2010-June-29, 09:02
George Carlin