Posted 2009-October-28, 17:27
Had the intervention been 3♥, 4♥ with this same hand (but spades) would be fairly obvious, undoubtedly a Michaels-type bid.
So, IMO, there are three plausible options:
1. 4♠. Practical, showing what you have. Even if the auction is going above 4♠ anyway, a major risk is partner not giving you slack.
2. 4♣. Reasonable start, planning 4♥ later. If 4♠ does pop in, though, you might lose hearts, and 5♦ is really ugly.
3. Pass. IMO, that just seems like fear.
I think I'd go 4♠. Practical, and accurate on shape.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
1♣*-P-2♣^-3♠-?
*: 16+ or equivalent value
^: 8+ GF, unbalanced, no 5 card major