BBO Discussion Forums: Rosenkranz doubles - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rosenkranz doubles

#1 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,077
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2011-January-30, 21:30

How do folks play Rosenkranz? Without discussion, I made a Rosenkranz double with Axxxx support for partner's suit (a 5332 hand) because I thought a simple raise would deny a high honor. Partner described my double as probably Hx. He thinks I should have raised right away to block the opponents.

Does a raise necessarily deny a high honor?
0

#2 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2011-January-30, 21:46

Whether a raise denies a spade A or K is immaterial on this hand. Rosenkranz are meant to help defend the hand, while you are pretty sure that you want to do whatever you can to declare. I think your partner is right to say you should make a blocking bid, which means that those bids do not necessarily deny the A or K.
Chris Gibson
0

#3 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,077
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2011-January-30, 22:18

Would you then only use a Rosenkranz double with Hx?

This link suggests that the raise denies an honor and I didn't want partner to be afraid of leading our suit.

http://www.ask.com/w...senkranz_double
0

#4 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-31, 01:59

IMO, consuming bidding space takes precedence over Rosenkranz and it makes sense to play the X only with Hx (maybe Axx if you want to stretch it).

Partner won't be afraid to lead the overcalled suit after a raise if that looks like the right opening lead...
foobar on BBO
0

#5 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,122
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-January-31, 02:11

Hi,

if you make a preemeptive raise, p knowes, our side has 9 cards
in the suit, so the risk, that a lead in this suit blowes a trick
is reduced, ..., the only holding is now bascially Qx vs. Ax.

So the only question is, if a single raise denies a top honor or
not.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#6 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-January-31, 02:20

View Poststraube, on 2011-January-30, 22:18, said:

Would you then only use a Rosenkranz double with Hx?

This link suggests that the raise denies an honor and I didn't want partner to be afraid of leading our suit.

http://www.ask.com/w...senkranz_double


The link you mention reads "if, instead, the advancer makes a raise to the two-level in overcaller's suit, he denies possession of a top honor in that suit" (my italics). With Axxxx you wouldn't be raising only to the two-level anyway.

I play Rosencranz redoubles, but when I have a raise I raise. Hence the redouble shows Hx or possibly a singleton honour.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users