whereagles, on Feb 12 2008, 10:11 AM, said:
pclayton, on Feb 12 2008, 05:20 PM, said:
If you Michaels this, you might as well lay your cards on the table and let declarer play the hand that way.
I refuse to see things by this window only. There's a lot of good things that can happen and one can't just weight the bad ones. If you tell me "the minuses outweight the plusses" then I might accept the reasoning. But to point out the bad stuff only is biasing judgement.
LOL, Nuno, you didn't even provide a reason for 2♠. Like a trout on a lure, you look at the colors and the 5-5 and you jump at 2♠, not even considering the drawbacks.
The advantages to 2♠ are:
1. We might have a cheap sac in 5♥ or 5♣
2. We might get pard interested in the bidding and compete in a partscore with his flat 11.
3. We might get pard off a poor diamond lead in 3N.
I don't consider these to be substantial and yes I think the minuses of 2♠ do outweight the plusses.

Help
