BBO Discussion Forums: 5-5 bad hand - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5-5 bad hand

#21 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-February-12, 12:21

whereagles, on Feb 12 2008, 10:11 AM, said:

pclayton, on Feb 12 2008, 05:20 PM, said:

If you Michaels this, you might as well lay your cards on the table and let declarer play the hand that way.

I refuse to see things by this window only. There's a lot of good things that can happen and one can't just weight the bad ones. If you tell me "the minuses outweight the plusses" then I might accept the reasoning. But to point out the bad stuff only is biasing judgement.

LOL, Nuno, you didn't even provide a reason for 2. Like a trout on a lure, you look at the colors and the 5-5 and you jump at 2, not even considering the drawbacks.

The advantages to 2 are:

1. We might have a cheap sac in 5 or 5
2. We might get pard interested in the bidding and compete in a partscore with his flat 11.
3. We might get pard off a poor diamond lead in 3N.

I don't consider these to be substantial and yes I think the minuses of 2 do outweight the plusses.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#22 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-February-12, 12:36

pclayton, on Feb 12 2008, 06:21 PM, said:

1. LOL, Nuno, you didn't even provide a reason for 2.

(...)

2. I don't consider these to be substantial and yes I think the minuses of 2 do outweight the plusses.

1. No reason is better than one-sided reasons only :rolleyes: :) :)

2. Ok, better now. As I said, I would bid at these colors, but I must say I haven't had enough experience with butting-in/pass on hands like this. So yeah, you could easily be right, statistically speaking.
0

#23 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-February-12, 13:56

pclayton, on Feb 12 2008, 01:21 PM, said:

1. We might have a cheap sac in 5 or 5
2. We might get pard interested in the bidding and compete in a partscore with his flat 11.
3. We might get pard off a poor diamond lead in 3N.

You forgot:

4. 2S might be the easiest way to reach a making 4H or 5C.
5. The opponents might have a harder time bidding over 2S than over 1S-p.

I do agree that 2S is a disgusting call, even though I said I would bid it. But when listing the advantages you might as well list all.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#24 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-February-12, 14:25

Pass. Bidding could turn out well here, but when it doesn't, it is likely to be a double-digit IMP swing. Plus I would like partner to not always expect such trash from me.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users