BBO Discussion Forums: how to reevaluate openers hand after raise - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

how to reevaluate openers hand after raise reevaluate after raise by responder

#1 User is offline   sgarlapati 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 2006-July-31

Posted 2006-December-16, 20:44

how to reevaluate openers hand after raise by responder.?add long suit pts or short suit or both.thanks
0

#2 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2006-December-16, 22:19

In general if you find a fit then use short suit points, and if you don't then use long suit points.

So after 1C p 1S p if you are considering 2S or 3S, adjust with short suit points (you have a fit).

After 1C p 1S p if you are considering 2C or 3C then use long suit points (add for a 7 card suit, etc).

Also remember shortness in partner's suit is a reason to be on the cautious side.
0

#3 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2006-December-16, 22:32

I'd suggest, at least for major-suit raises, using a losing trick count approach. LTC is most ideal for the bid-and-raise auction with a major focus. "Points" is a difficult method to use, despite it's introduction as, ironically, to make things easier.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#4 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,889
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2006-December-17, 01:34

sgarlapati, on Dec 16 2006, 09:44 PM, said:

how to reevaluate openers hand after raise by responder.?add long suit pts or short suit or both.thanks

Not both, if you have length, you have
shortness as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2006-December-17, 02:28

I can't remember ever using length or shortage points after a simple raise.

Most times you can make a decent estimate of how many tricks you will make opposite partner's hand.

A simple raise shows around 6-9 points which typically will cover somewhere between zero and four of your losers - four might be something like two working kings, the trump queen and a useful ruffing value. Some modified Losing Trick Count approach should work well.

If I need one cover card I would just bid game.

If I need two cover cards then I will just bid game under pressure but with no opposition bidding I will make a game try - short or long suit depending on your methods.

If I need three cover cards then I might make a game try especially if there are a variety of combinations of cards that will make game.

If I need more than this I pass.

In all of this I am optimistic as there are always other ways making your contract. One of my favourite partners has a saying 'nothing a few finesses won't cure'.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users