BBO Discussion Forums: Another Balancing Problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Another Balancing Problem What's the minimum for a balancing bid?

#1 User is offline   Kalvan14 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 839
  • Joined: 2005-October-20

Posted 2006-February-06, 17:56

Scoring: MP

(1S)-p-(p)-2C-(p)-?

1S: 5-card major


Two questions for you guys:
- what are you bidding now?
- which is your agreed minimum for a 2 balancing bid?
0

#2 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2006-February-06, 18:09

3N. I have no tricks, but hopefully I'll make it on sheer power.

Agreed minimum is hard to quantify. x xxx xxx AQJxxx would be a 2C bid.

edit: 13 cards would be nice too :)
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2006-February-06, 18:42

I can't imagine stopping below game either.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 User is offline   Kalvan14 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 839
  • Joined: 2005-October-20

Posted 2006-February-06, 19:16

Hannie, on Feb 6 2006, 07:42 PM, said:

I can't imagine stopping below game either.

A clear target, but this statement does not provide us with a re-bid
0

#5 User is offline   HeartA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,016
  • Joined: 2004-October-17

Posted 2006-February-06, 19:19

Jlall, on Feb 6 2006, 07:09 PM, said:

3N. I have no tricks, but hopefully I'll make it on sheer power.

Agreed minimum is hard to quantify. x xxx xxx AQJxxx would be a 2C bid.

edit: 13 cards would be nice too :)

3N, wtp?

Maybe one big card is missing?
Senshu
0

#6 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2006-February-06, 19:26

Kalvan14, on Feb 6 2006, 08:16 PM, said:

Hannie, on Feb 6 2006, 07:42 PM, said:

I can't imagine stopping below game either.

A clear target, but this statement does not provide us with a re-bid

I don't like to repeat what Justin has just said, I already do it far too often. So yes, I would bid 3NT.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#7 User is offline   Kalvan14 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 839
  • Joined: 2005-October-20

Posted 2006-February-06, 22:29

With which of the following hands (if any) would you balance with 2:
  • x Kxx xxx AJTxxx
  • x Jxx Qxx AJxxxx
  • xx KJx xxx QJxxx
  • xx KJx xxx QTxxx
  • xx KJx xxx JTxxx

0

#8 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,655
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2006-February-06, 22:46

Kalvan14, on Feb 6 2006, 11:29 PM, said:

With which of the following hands (if any) would you balance with 2:
  • x Kxx xxx AJTxxx
  • x Jxx Qxx AJxxxx
  • xx KJx xxx QJxxx
  • xx KJx xxx QTxxx
  • xx KJx xxx JTxxx

The first one, definitely. The second one, possible, but probably not.

The other three, no.

I expect partner to usually take action with 16+ hcp in direct seat. The only exception is a huge stack of spades. With doubleton spade, this is unlikely. I see no reason to push opponents into a better strain by bidding 2 on a hand where they likely have the majority of values and I have only a weakish 5-card suit.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#9 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2006-February-06, 22:55

1 and 2 are ok for me.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users